Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 27;16(12):1468-1479.
doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i12.1468.

Lipophagy and epigenetic alterations are related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease progression in an experimental model

Affiliations

Lipophagy and epigenetic alterations are related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease progression in an experimental model

Felipe Schütz et al. World J Hepatol. .

Abstract

Background: Genetic and epigenetic alterations are related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) pathogenesis.

Aim: To evaluate micro (mi)RNAs and lipophagy markers in an experimental model of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).

Methods: Adult male Sprague Dawley rats were randomized into two groups: Control group (n = 10) fed a standard diet; and intervention group (n = 10) fed a high-fat-choline-deficient diet for 16 weeks. Molecular evaluation of lipophagy markers in liver tissue [sirtuin-1, p62/sequestosome-1, transcription factor-EB, perilipin-2 (Plin2), Plin3, Plin5, lysosome-associated membrane proteins-2, rubicon, and Cd36], and serum miRNAs were performed.

Results: Animals in the intervention group developed MASH and showed a significant decrease in sirtuin-1 (P = 0.020) and p62/sequestosome-1 (P < 0.001); the opposite was reported for transcription factor-EB (P = 0.020), Plin2 (P = 0.003), Plin3 (P = 0.031), and Plin5 (P = 0.005) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference between groups for lysosome-associated membrane proteins-2 (P = 0.715), rubicon (P = 0.166), and Cd36 (P = 0.312). The intervention group showed a significant increase in miR-34a (P = 0.005) and miR-21 (P = 0.043) compared to the control. There was no significant difference between groups for miR-375 (P = 0.905), miR-26b (P = 0.698), and miR-155 (P = 0.688).

Conclusion: Animals with MASH presented expression changes in markers related to lysosomal stress and autophagy as well as in miRNAs related to inflammation and fibrogenesis, processes that promote MASLD progression.

Keywords: Animal model; Epigenetic; Lipophagy; Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis; Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; MicroRNAs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Animals received a standard or high-fat and choline-deficient diet, together with water (ad libitum) during the 16 weeks of the experiment. All animals were euthanized at the end. HFCD: High-fat and choline-deficient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gene expression of circulating microRNAs. A: Micro (mi)R-34a; B: MiR-21; C: MiR-375; D: MiR-26b; E: MiR-155 (P = 0.688). Mann-Whitney U test, aP < 0.05 considered significant. Variables are described as median (25th-75th percentiles).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hepatic gene expression of lipophagy markers. A: Sirtuin-1; B: Lysosome-associated membrane protein-2; C: P62/sequestosome-1; D: Transcription factor EB; E: Rubicon; F: Cd36; G: Perilipin 2 (Plin2); H: Plin3; I: Plin5. aP < 0.05 considered significant, Mann-Whitney U test. Variables are described as median (25th-75th percentiles). Lamp2: Lysosome-associated membrane protein-2; Plin: Perilipin; p62/Sqstm1: P62/sequestosome-1; Sirt1: Sirtuin-1; Tfeb: Transcription factor EB.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Inflammation, fibrosis, and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease status. A: Results after dividing the intervention group in two halves according to their inflammation status; B: Results after dividing the intervention group in two halves according to their fibrosis status; C: Results after dividing the intervention group in two halves according to their metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease status. Plin: Perilipin; Tfeb: Transcription factor EB; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlations between circulating microRNAs and gene expression. A: Correlation between Sirtuin-1 (Sirt1) and p62/sequestosome-1; B: Correlation between Sirt1 and rubicon; C: Correlation between micro (mi)R26b and miR-21. P62/Sqstm1: Sequestosome-1; Sirt1: Sirtuin-1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, Sanyal AJ. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med. 2018;24:908–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang DQ, El-Serag HB, Loomba R. Global epidemiology of NAFLD-related HCC: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:223–238. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. - PubMed
    1. Xian YX, Weng JP, Xu F. MAFLD vs. NAFLD: shared features and potential changes in epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and pharmacotherapy. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020;134:8–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nassir F. NAFLD: Mechanisms, Treatments, and Biomarkers. Biomolecules. 2022;12 - PMC - PubMed