ESAIC focused guidelines for the management of the failing epidural during labour epidural analgesia
- PMID: 39744744
- DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002108
ESAIC focused guidelines for the management of the failing epidural during labour epidural analgesia
Abstract
Background: Labour epidural analgesia reportedly fails in up to 10 to 25% of cases. A joint taskforce of European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) experts was created to develop this focused guideline on the management of failing epidural analgesia in a previously well functioning epidural catheter.
Design: Six clinical questions were defined using a PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) strategy to conduct a systematic literature search. The questions pertained to clinical management of failing epidural (PICOs 1, 2 and 3), human resource and team training (PICOs 4 and 5) and clinical management of a failing epidural for intrapartum caesarean delivery (PICO 6). The taskforce produced recommendations and clinical practice statements (CPS) and validated them through a Delphi process. The final version of the guideline was submitted to all ESAIC members for critical review and approved by the Guidelines Committee and the ESAIC Board of Directors.
Results: In the initial search, 3737 titles were identified, 93 were retained for complete article analysis and 56 were finally allocated to the PICOs. The full-text analysis of the selected articles precluded extraction of significant data for all PICOs except for PICO 6, for which six articles were identified. Based on the experience, knowledge and opinion of the experts, the task force proposed and validated two recommendations and 11 CPSs.
Conclusion: This guideline complemented other recently published expert opinion papers. We hope that this new guidance will serve clinicians to increase parturient safety and quality of care during labour and delivery, while at the same time provide inspiration for further research to fill the current knowledge gaps.
Copyright © 2024 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Similar articles
-
Intrathecal catheter placement after inadvertent dural puncture in the obstetric population: management for labour and operative delivery. Guidelines from the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association.Anaesthesia. 2024 Dec;79(12):1348-1368. doi: 10.1111/anae.16434. Epub 2024 Sep 27. Anaesthesia. 2024. PMID: 39327940 Review.
-
Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 9;11(11):CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30411804 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a predictive risk factor model for epidural re-siting in women undergoing labour epidural analgesia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0638-x. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018. PMID: 30497401 Free PMC article.
-
Extending epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(6):1127-1133. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1743661. Epub 2020 Mar 23. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022. PMID: 32204637
-
Epidural analgesia in labour and risk of caesarean delivery.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;28(5):400-11. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12139. Epub 2014 Jul 18. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 25040829
References
-
- Halliday L, Kinsella M, Shaw M, et al. Comparison of ultra-low, low and high concentration local anaesthetic for labour epidural analgesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:910–918.
-
- Ezeonu PO, Anozie OB, Onu FA, et al. Perceptions and practice of epidural analgesia among women attending antenatal clinic in FETHA. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9:905–911.
-
- Van Leugenhaege L, Degraeve J, Jacquemyn Y, et al. Factors associated with the intention of pregnant women to give birth with epidural analgesia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:598.
-
- Baghirzada L, Archer D, Walker A, Balki M. Anesthesia-related adverse events in obstetric patients: a population-based study in Canada. Can J Anaesth 2022; 69:72–85.
-
- Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358:19–23.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources