Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Mar 1;11(3):258-267.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5636.

Transplant and Nontransplant Salvage Therapy in Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: The EuroNet-PHL-R1 Phase 3 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Transplant and Nontransplant Salvage Therapy in Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: The EuroNet-PHL-R1 Phase 3 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Stephen Daw et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: The current standard-of-care salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) includes consolidation high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT)/autologous stem cell transplant (aSCT).

Objective: To investigate whether presalvage risk factors and fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) response to reinduction chemotherapy can guide escalation or de-escalation between HDCT/aSCT or transplant-free consolidation with radiotherapy to minimize toxic effects while maintaining high cure rates.

Design, setting, and participants: EuroNet-PHL-R1 was a nonrandomized clinical trial that enrolled patients younger than 18 years with first relapsed/refractory cHL across 68 sites in 13 countries in Europe between January 2007 and January 2013. Data were analyzed between September 2022 and July 2024.

Intervention: Reinduction chemotherapy consisted of alternating IEP (ifosfamide, etoposide, prednisolone) and ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). Patients with low-risk disease (late relapse after 2 cycles of first-line chemotherapy and any relapse with an adequate response after 1 IEP/ABVD defined as complete metabolic response on FDG-PET and at least 50% volume reduction) received a second IEP/ABVD cycle and radiotherapy (RT) to all sites involved at relapse. Patients with high-risk disease (all primary progressions and relapses with inadequate response after 1 IEP/ABVD cycle) received a second IEP/ABVD cycle plus HDCT/aSCT with or without RT.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was 5-year event-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). PFS was identical to event-free survival because no secondary cancers were observed. PFS data alone are presented for simplicity.

Results: Of 118 patients analyzed, 58 (49.2%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 16.3 (14.5-17.6) years. The median (IQR) follow-up was 67.5 (58.5-77.0) months. The overall 5-year PFS was 71.3% (95% CI, 63.5%-80.1%), and OS was 82.7% (95% CI, 75.8%-90.1%). For patients in the low-risk group (n = 59), 41 received nontransplant salvage with a 5-year PFS of 89.7% (95% CI, 80.7%-99.8%) and OS of 97.4% (95% CI, 92.6%-100%). In contrast, 18 received HDCT/aSCT off protocol, with a 5-year PFS of 88.9% (95% CI, 75.5%-100%) and OS of 100%. All 59 patients with high-risk disease received HDCT/aSCT (and 23 received post-HDCT/aSCT RT) with a 5-year PFS of 53.3% (95% CI, 41.8%-67.9%) and OS of 66.5% (95% CI, 54.9%-80.5%).

Conclusion and relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, FDG-PET response-guided salvage in relapsed cHL may identify patients in whom transplant-free salvage achieves excellent outcomes. HDCT/aSCT may be reserved for primary progression and relapsed cHL with inadequate response.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00433459.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Cepelova reported a study grant (MK-3475-667 trial) from Merck (MSD). Prof Fernandez-Teijeiro reported travel grants and consultant fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clinigen, Eusa Pharma, Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Servier, Sobi, and Takeda. Dr Leblanc reported travel grants and personal consultant fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. Prof Klapper reported institutional research grants from Amgen, Incyte, Janssen, Regeneron, Roche, and Takeda. Prof Mauz-Körholz reported institutional research grants from Merck (MSD).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Flowchart and Patient Disposition of the EuroNet-R1 Trial
Of 118 patients analyzed, all were stratified into 3 groups: relapse group 1 (RG-1), patients with late relapse after 2 cycles of first-line treatment; relapse group 2 (RG-2), any other relapse; relapse group 3 (RG-3), patients with primary progressive disease. Patients in RG-1 (n = 12) were considered low risk, and those allocated to RG-3 (n = 24) were considered high-risk. Patients in RG-2 (n = 82) were stratified to low risk (n = 29) or high risk (n = 35), according to their positron emission tomography (PET) response after the first IEP-ABVD (ifosfamide, etoposide, prednisone-adriamycin [doxorubicin], bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) cycle. Eighteen patients in RG-2 with an adequate response (AR) were treated with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and autologous stem cell transplant off protocol. IR indicates inadequate response; nLPHL, nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma; RT, radiotherapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Plot for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) of the EuroNet-PHL-R1 Cohort
Kaplan-Meier estimates of 118 patients analyzed in the EuroNet-PHL-R1 trial for OS and PFS are illustrated in this figure. Because no secondary cancers were documented, the event rates consist of only death and/or disease progression. Thus, PFS depiction was chosen.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of Distinct Subgroups in a Forest Plot
Of 118 patients analyzed, all were stratified into 3 groups: relapse group 1 (RG-1), patients with late relapse after 2 cycles of first-line treatment; relapse group 2 (RG-2), any other relapse; relapse group 3 (RG-3), patients with primary progressive disease. PFS rates at 5 years with 95% CIs are illustrated in the forest plot. All patients with an inadequate response (IR) in RG-3 and RG-2 were considered high risk and received BEAM, (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). All patients in RG-1 and any patients in RG-2 with AR were considered low risk and treated with radiotherapy (RT) per protocol. Eighteen patients in RG-2 with an adequate response (AR) were treated with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and autologous stem cell transplant off protocol. LRA indicates late response assessment.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Kaplan-Meier Plot for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) of Different Risk Groups
Of 118 patients analyzed, all were stratified into 3 groups: relapse group 1, patients with late relapse after 2 cycles of first-line treatment; relapse group 2, any other relapse; relapse group 3, patients with primary progressive disease. All patients with an inadequate response in risk groups 2 and 3 were considered high risk and received BEAM, (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). All patients in risk group 1 and any patients in risk group 2 with adequate response were considered low risk and treated with radiotherapy (RT) per protocol. Eighteen patients in RG-2 with an adequate response (AR) were treated with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and autologous stem cell transplant off protocol.

Comment on

References

    1. Castellino SM, Giulino-Roth L, Harker-Murray P, et al. ; COG Hodgkin Lymphoma Committee . Children’s Oncology Group’s 2023 blueprint for research: Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023;70(Suppl 6)(suppl 6):e30580. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30580 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mauz-Körholz C, Landman-Parker J, Balwierz W, et al. Response-adapted omission of radiotherapy and comparison of consolidation chemotherapy in children and adolescents with intermediate-stage and advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (EuroNet-PHL-C1): a titration study with an open-label, embedded, multinational, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(1):125-137. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00470-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mauz-Körholz C, Landman-Parker J, Fernández-Teijeiro A, et al. Response-adapted omission of radiotherapy in children and adolescents with early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma and an adequate response to vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and doxorubicin (EuroNet-PHL-C1): a titration study. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(3):252-261. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00019-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daw S, Hasenclever D, Mascarin M, et al. Risk and response adapted treatment guidelines for managing first relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in children and young people—recommendations from the EuroNet pediatric hodgkin lymphoma group. Hemasphere. 2020;4(1):e329. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000329 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harker-Murray PD, Drachtman RA, Hodgson DC, Chauvenet AR, Kelly KM, Cole PD. Stratification of treatment intensity in relapsed pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(4):579-586. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24851 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data