Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 1;10(3):214-223.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4796.

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography for Prediction of Incident Hypertension

Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography for Prediction of Incident Hypertension

Arunashis Sau et al. JAMA Cardiol. .

Abstract

Importance: Hypertension underpins significant global morbidity and mortality. Early lifestyle intervention and treatment are effective in reducing adverse outcomes. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) has been shown to identify a broad spectrum of subclinical disease and may be useful for predicting incident hypertension.

Objective: To develop an AI-ECG risk estimator (AIRE) to predict incident hypertension (AIRE-HTN) and stratify risk for hypertension-associated adverse outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a development and external validation prognostic cohort study conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in Boston, Massachusetts, a secondary care setting. External validation was conducted in the UK Biobank (UKB), a UK-based volunteer cohort. AIRE-HTN was trained and tested to predict incident hypertension using routinely collected ECGs from patients at BIDMC between 2014 and 2023. The algorithm was then evaluated to risk stratify patients for hypertension- associated adverse outcomes and externally validated on UKB data between 2014 and 2022 for both incident hypertension and risk stratification.

Main outcomes and measures: AIRE-HTN, which uses a residual convolutional neural network architecture with a discrete-time survival loss function, was trained to predict incident hypertension.

Results: AIRE-HTN was trained on 1 163 401 ECGs from 189 539 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [18.7] years; 98 747 female [52.1%]) at BIDMC. A total of 19 423 BIDMC patients composed the test set and were evaluated for incident hypertension. From the UKB, AIRE-HTN was tested on 65 610 ECGs from same number of participants (mean [SD] age, 65.4 [7.9] years; 33 785 female [51.5%]). A total of 35 806 UKB patients were evaluated for incident hypertension. AIRE-HTN predicted incident hypertension (BIDMC: n = 6446 [33%] events; C index, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71; UKB: n = 1532 [4%] events; C index, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71). Performance was maintained in individuals without left ventricular hypertrophy and those with normal ECGs (C indices, 0.67-0.72). AIRE-HTN was significantly additive to existing clinical risk factors in predicting incident hypertension (continuous net reclassification index, BIDMC: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.53; UKB: 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23-0.37). In adjusted Cox models, AIRE-HTN score was an independent predictor of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.67-3.00) and stratified risk for heart failure (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.22-3.04), myocardial infarction (HR, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.55-3.83), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37), and chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.68-2.12), beyond traditional risk factors.

Conclusions and relevance: Results suggest that AIRE-HTN, an AI-ECG model, can predict incident hypertension and identify patients at risk of hypertension-related adverse events, beyond conventional clinical risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Sau reported receiving grants from the British Heart Foundation during the conduct of the study. Dr Pastika reported receiving grants from Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship during the conduct of the study. Dr Sieliwonczyk reported receiving grants from Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust and EJP RD Research Mobility Fellowship (European Reference Networks) during the conduct of the study. Dr McGurk reported receiving personal fees from Checkpoint Capital LP outside the submitted work. Prof O’Regan reported receiving grants from Bayer and Calico and personal fees from BMS outside the submitted work. Prof Ware reported receiving grants from Sir Jules Thorn Trust, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research Imperial BRC, British Heart Foundation, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer (research contracts to institution) and advisory fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Foresite Labs, Health Lumen, and Tenaya outside the submitted work. Dr Waks reported receiving laboratory work fees from HeartcoR Solutions and advisory board fees/grants from Anumana for research funding outside the submitted work. Dr Ng reported receiving grants from British Heart Foundation and the National Institute for Health Research during the conduct of the study and personal fees from GE Healthcare and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Electrocardiography Risk Estimation Platform for Prediction of Incident Hypertension (AIRE-HTN)
AIRE-HTN stratified risk of incident hypertension in the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) (A) and UK Biobank (UKB) (B) cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves show cumulative probabilities of hypertension for the 4 quartiles of risk defined by AIRE-HTN predictions using a single ECG.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cox Models for Prediction of Incident Hypertension
Hypertension prediction C index results comparing the artificial intelligence–enhanced electrocardiography risk estimation platform for prediction of incident hypertension (AIRE-HTN) with clinical risk prediction methods for the prediction of incident hypertension. AIRE-HTN-Cox includes AIRE-HTN, age, sex, and ECG parameters. Hypertension risk factors include systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), smoking status, prevalent diabetes, and ethnicity.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Electrocardiography Risk Estimation Platform for Prediction of Incident Hypertension (AIRE-HTN) Score and Hypertension-Related Adverse Outcomes
In adjusted Cox models, AIRE-HTN score is an independent predictor of hypertension-related adverse outcomes in individuals without existing cardiovascular/kidney disease (A and C) and without existing cardiovascular/kidney disease but with hypertension (B and D). Covariates for Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) analysis: age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, smoking status, prevalent diabetes, prevalent hypertension, prevalent hyperlipidemia, and ethnicity. UK Biobank (UKB) analyses additionally included body mass index and number of antihypertensives as covariates. Hazard ratio (HR) refers to 1-SD increase of AIRE-HTN score.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Explainability Analyses
A, A variational autoencoder was used to identify the most important morphological features in artificial intelligence–enhanced electrocardiography risk estimation platform for prediction of incident hypertension (AIRE-HTN) score, each subpanel shows 1 of 3 latent features. B, Mean (SD) (shaded region) electrocardiography (ECG) waveforms for the 10000 highest and lowest AIRE-HTN score from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) test set.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) Imaging Associations of Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Electrocardiography Risk Estimation Platform for Prediction of Incident Hypertension (AIRE-HTN) Score
Univariate correlation between AIRE-HTN score and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), UK Biobank (UKB) cohort (A) and echocardiographic, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) cohort (B) parameters was performed. Variables with multiple points indicate results of multiple measurements at varying anatomical locations. Comparisons meeting significance after Bonferroni correction are shown. AV indicates aortic valve; E, E wave; E′, E wave prime; E/A, E wave to A wave ratio; echo, echocardiography; E/e′, E wave over e prime; circum, circumferential; inf, inferior; LA, left atrium; lat, lateral; LV, left ventricle; LVEDD, left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end systolic dimension; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; MV peak A, mitral valve inflow velocity in late diastole due to atrial contraction; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . National Center for Health Statistics mortality data on CDC WONDER. Accessed February 2, 2023. https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd.html
    1. World Health Organization . Global report on hypertension: the race against a silent killer. Accessed February 2, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240081062
    1. Carey RM, Muntner P, Bosworth HB, Whelton PK. Prevention and control of hypertension: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(11):1278-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998;97:48-54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.1.48 - DOI - PubMed