Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan;45(1):e240077.
doi: 10.1148/rg.240077.

CT Angiography of the Upper Extremities: Review of Acute Arterial Entities

Affiliations
Review

CT Angiography of the Upper Extremities: Review of Acute Arterial Entities

Daniel D Friedman et al. Radiographics. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Historically, evaluation of the upper extremity vasculature was performed using digital subtraction angiography. With the advancement of cross-sectional imaging and submillimeter isotropic data acquisition, CT angiography (CTA) has become an excellent noninvasive diagnostic tool for evaluation of the vasculature of the upper extremities. CTA allows quick evaluation of vessel patency and irregularity and achievement of the anatomic detail needed in preoperative planning. When interpreting CTA of the upper extremities, radiologists must be familiar with the normal vascular anatomy, common vascular anomalies, and pitfalls or artifacts that may mimic or mask abnormality. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the utility of CTA of the upper extremities. Also discussed are CTA techniques and the use of several newer technologies including dual-energy and photon-counting detector CT. The utility of CTA in patients with upper extremity trauma is explored, with a focus on assessing vascular injury. Other vascular abnormalities including infection, acute limb ischemia, and vasculitis are discussed. It is imperative for radiologists to be accustomed to CTA of the upper extremities in diagnosing acute vascular abnormalities and to recognize common pitfalls and mimics of these abnormalities. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of conflicts of interest.—: M.I. Consulting fees from Ocelot Bio and Sonosim. All other authors, the editor, and the reviewers have disclosed no relevant relationships.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eyers P , Earnshaw JJ . Acute non-traumatic arm ischaemia . Br J Surg 1998. ; 85 ( 10 ): 1340 – 1346 . - PubMed
    1. Ziegler-Graham K , MacKenzie EJ , Ephraim PL , Travison TG , Brookmeyer R . Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050 . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008. ; 89 ( 3 ): 422 – 429 . - PubMed
    1. Stonebridge PA , Clason AE , Duncan AJ , Nolan B , Jenkins AM , Ruckley CV . Acute ischaemia of the upper limb compared with acute lower limb ischaemia; a 5-year review . Br J Surg 1989. ; 76 ( 5 ): 515 – 516 . - PubMed
    1. Pederson WC . Acute Ischemia of the Upper Extremity . Orthop Clin North Am 2016. ; 47 ( 3 ): 589 – 597 . - PubMed
    1. Franz RW , Skytta CK , Shah KJ , Hartman JF , Wright ML . A five-year review of management of upper-extremity arterial injuries at an urban level I trauma center . Ann Vasc Surg 2012. ; 26 ( 5 ): 655 – 664 . - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources