Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39746207
- PMCID: PMC11842204
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005821
Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: To systematically assess the existing empiric evidence regarding a potential relationship between higher body weight and procedural abortion complications.
Data sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched.
Methods of study selection: Our search identified 409 studies, which were uploaded to Covidence for review management; 133 duplicates were automatically removed. A team of two reviewers screened 276 studies, and a third reviewer resolved conflicts. Studies were included if they 1) consisted of peer-reviewed research published between 2010 and 2022, 2) were conducted in the United States, 3) included people with a higher body weight (body mass index [BMI] 30 or higher) in the study sample, and 4) assessed at least one outcome of procedural abortion safety stratified by a measure of body weight.
Tabulation, integration, and results: We extracted study data using Covidence and calculated an odds ratio for each study to facilitate the synthesis of results. Six studies assessing a total of 38,960 participants were included. No studies found a significant relationship between procedural abortion complications and higher body weight overall. Subgroup analysis from one study identified a significant increase in complications specifically among participants with BMIs higher than 40 who had second-trimester abortions. All studies used a retrospective cohort design and fulfilled Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria to be considered good quality. Studies varied in terms of clinical settings, patient populations, gestations assessed, clinician training levels, and care protocols.
Conclusion: Overall, higher body weight was not associated with an increased risk of procedural abortion complications in the included studies. The practice of referring patients undergoing procedural abortion with a higher body weight for hospital-based care is not based on recent safety evidence. On the contrary, this practice threatens the health of people with a higher body weight by potentially delaying their access to abortion care, extending their pregnancies into later gestations, and blocking their ability to access an abortion altogether.
Copyright © 2025 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure Whitney S. Rice reports that her institution received funding from the Collaborative for Gender+Reproductive Equity, a project of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- McCann A, Walker AS. One Year, 61 Clinics: How Dobbs Changed the Abortion Landscape. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/22/us/abortion-clinics-dobbs.... June 23, 2023. Accessed October 26, 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
