Part-based processing, but not holistic processing, predicts individual differences in face recognition abilities
- PMID: 39746240
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106057
Part-based processing, but not holistic processing, predicts individual differences in face recognition abilities
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the roles of part-based and holistic processing for face processing ability (FPA). A psychophysical paradigm in which the efficiency at recognizing isolated or combined facial parts was used (N = 64), and holistic processing was defined as the perceptual integration from multiple parts. FPA and object processing ability were measured using a battery of tasks. A multiple linear regression including three predictors, namely perceptual integration, part-based efficiency, and object processing, explained 40 % of the variance in FPA. Most importantly, our results reveal a strong predictive relationship between part-based efficiency and FPA, a small predictive relationship between object processing ability and FPA, and no predictive relationship between perceptual integration and FPA. This result was obtained despite considerable variance in perceptual integration skills-with some participants exhibiting a highly efficient integration. These results indicate that part-based processing plays a pivotal role in FPA, whereas holistic processing does not.
Keywords: Face perception; Face recognition; Individual differences; Integration efficiency; Psychophysics.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The author(s) declared that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Limited evidence of individual differences in holistic processing in different versions of the part-whole paradigm.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1453-1465. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1311-z. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017. PMID: 28361393
-
Global precedence effects account for individual differences in both face and object recognition performance.Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1365-1372. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1458-1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 29560562
-
Individual Differences in Serial Dependence of Facial Identity are Associated with Face Recognition Abilities.Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 2;9(1):18020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53282-3. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31792249 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1281-302. doi: 10.1037/a0037004. Epub 2014 Jun 23. Psychol Bull. 2014. PMID: 24956123 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The "parts and wholes" of face recognition: A review of the literature.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct;69(10):1876-89. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016. PMID: 26886495 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Facial Recognition Algorithms: A Systematic Literature Review.J Imaging. 2025 Feb 13;11(2):58. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11020058. J Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39997560 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources