Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses
- PMID: 39747414
- PMCID: PMC11696901
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83838-x
Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses
Abstract
Photic phenomena are more pronounced in presbyopia-corrected than in monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), causing dissatisfaction after cataract surgery. Photic Phenomena Test (PPT) quantifies photic phenomena in eyes with two types of presbyopia-corrected IOL. We examined the relationship between preoperative eye shape and pupil diameter. We included patients with PanOptix IOLs (PanOptix group, n = 38; 65.7 ± 9.2 years old) and Synergy IOLs (Synergy group, n = 39; 61.9 ± 9.6 years old), who underwent the PPT between 1 and 3 months after cataract surgery, from January 2021 to April 2023. The relationships between age, sex, pupil diameter, and higher-order corneal aberrations were examined and mean values for PPT measurements were compared between the groups. There was no difference in glare between the two groups. The halo was larger and thicker, and the starburst was larger and stronger in the Synergy group (P < 0.01). Postoperative halo brightness was positively correlated with the corneal coma aberration in the PanOptix group (P < 0.05). The Synergy group showed a positive correlation between the size and brightness of the postoperative halo and starburst and pupil diameter (P < 0.01). PPT, thus, revealed risk factors in eyes with two types of presbyopia-corrected IOL, which can be examined before cataract surgery to provide critical information for IOL selection.
Keywords: Cataract surgery; Eye shape; Intraocular lens; Photic phenomena; Pupil size.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Risk factors in self-reported dissatisfied patients implanted with various presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract surgery.BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03912-4. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39972278 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative assessment of photic phenomena in the presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260406. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34851975 Free PMC article.
-
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 18;6(6):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 27;1:CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3. PMID: 32584432 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5. Ophthalmology. 2008. PMID: 18538402 Clinical Trial.
-
BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Management with intraocular lenses.Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Aug;47(4):102253. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102253. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024. PMID: 39068141 Review.
References
-
- de Vries, N. E. & Nuijts, R. M. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.39, 268–278 (2013). - PubMed
-
- Kim, E. J. et al. Refractive outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens exchange. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.43, 761–766 (2017). - PubMed
-
- Alio, J. L., Plaza-Puche, A. B., Férnandez-Buenaga, R., Pikkel, J. & Maldonado, M. Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview. Surv. Ophthalmol.62, 611–634 (2017). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous