Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;49(9):2568-2587.
doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04656-0. Epub 2025 Jan 2.

Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Cited Papers in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Siddig Ibrahim Abdelwahab  1 , Manal Mohamed Elhassan Taha  1 , Abdullah Farasani  2 , Ahmed Ali Jerah  2 , Saleh M Abdullah  2 , Bassem Oraibi  3 , Yasir Babiker  4 , Hassan Ahmad Alfaifi  5 , Amal Hamdan Alzahrani  6 , Ahmed S Alamer  7 , Tawfeeq Altherwi  8 , Ibrahim Abdel Aziz Ibrahim  9 , Waseem Hassan  10
Affiliations

Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Cited Papers in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Siddig Ibrahim Abdelwahab et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May.

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited papers in aesthetic plastic surgery.

Methods: The analysis utilized VOSviewer, bibliometrix and biblioshiny packages in R. A keyword analysis was performed on all publications. Annual publication trends, mean total citations per article (MeanTCperArt), mean citation rate per year (MeanTCperYear), authors, institutions and countries contributions were examined.

Results: From 1976 to October 2024, a total of 5460 papers (5010 articles and 450 reviews) were published in the journal, reflecting a modest annual growth rate of 1.79%. Among these, the top 100 most cited papers averaged 159.7 citations per article. These highly cited works had an average document age of 22.7 years, emphasizing their long-lasting impact. Authorship analysis revealed contributions from 327 authors, with notable contributors such as Spear SL and Farkas LG, each authoring three of the top 100 papers. The Second University of Naples emerged as a leading institution with 13 contributions, while the USA stood out as the most prolific country, publishing 29 papers in this dataset. Citation trends demonstrated variability across decades. From 1981 to 1989, citation averages per article ranged between 92 and 165, with mean citation rates per year (MeanTCperYear) from 2.09 to 4.32. Publications from 2015 achieved a MeanTCperYear of 16.80, while 2018 papers recorded annual citation rate of 30.0.

Conclusion: The analysis of research themes within the top 100 cited papers revealed influential topics and trends that have shaped the literature in aesthetic plastic surgery. These findings highlight the journal's critical role in advancing the field.

No level assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Keywords: Aesthetic plastic surgery; Author impact; Bibliometric analysis; Citation analysis; Research focus; Top-cited papers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Human and Animal Rights: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed Consent: For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bai L, Chen K. A bibliometric analysis of the articles published in the aesthetic plastic surgery journal (1976–2023). Aesth Plastic Surg. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04456-6 . - DOI
    1. Van EN, Waltman L. Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38. - DOI
    1. Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics. 1991;22(1):155–205. - DOI
    1. Leung XY, Sun J, Bai B. Bibliometrics of social media research: a co-citation and co-word analysis. Int J Hosp Manag. 2017;66:35–45. - DOI
    1. Hassan W, Hussain S, da Rocha JBT. The research scholarly output of Africa in dermatology from 2012 to 2021: focus on the Top 10 dermatology journals. JMIR Dermatol. 2023;6:e41703. https://doi.org/10.2196/41703 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources