Preoperative discrimination of absence or presence of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer with an MRI-based multimodal deep learning radiomics model
- PMID: 39747670
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04766-y
Preoperative discrimination of absence or presence of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer with an MRI-based multimodal deep learning radiomics model
Abstract
Objective: Accurate preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion (MI) is essential for treatment decisions in endometrial cancer (EC). However, the diagnostic accuracy of commonly utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for this assessment exhibits considerable variability. This study aims to enhance preoperative discrimination of absence or presence of MI by developing and validating a multimodal deep learning radiomics (MDLR) model based on MRI.
Methods: During March 2010 and February 2023, 1139 EC patients (age 54.771 ± 8.465 years; range 24-89 years) from five independent centers were enrolled retrospectively. We utilized ResNet18 to extract multi-scale deep learning features from T2-weighted imaging followed by feature selection via Mann-Whitney U test. Subsequently, a Deep Learning Signature (DLS) was formulated using Integrated Sparse Bayesian Extreme Learning Machine. Furthermore, we developed Clinical Model (CM) based on clinical characteristics and MDLR model by integrating clinical characteristics with DLS. The area under the curve (AUC) was used for evaluating diagnostic performance of the models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and integrated discrimination index (IDI) were used to assess the clinical benefit and compare the predictive performance of models.
Results: The MDLR model comprised of age, histopathologic grade, subjective MR findings (TMD and Reading for MI status) and DLS demonstrated the best predictive performance. The AUC values for MDLR in training set, internal validation set, external validation set 1, and external validation set 2 were 0.899 (95% CI, 0.866-0.926), 0.874 (95% CI, 0.829-0.912), 0.862 (95% CI, 0.817-0.899) and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.806-0.914) respectively. The IDI and DCA showed higher diagnostic performance and clinical net benefits for the MDLR than for CM or DLS, which revealed MDLR may enhance decision-making support.
Conclusions: The MDLR which incorporated clinical characteristics and DLS could improve preoperative accuracy in discriminating absence or presence of MI. This improvement may facilitate individualized treatment decision-making for EC.
Keywords: Deep learning; Endometrial cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myometrial invasion.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics combined with 3D deep transfer learning to predict cervical stromal invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Mar;50(3):1414-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04577-1. Epub 2024 Sep 14. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 39276192
-
A multimodal deep learning radiomics model for predicting degenerative meniscus tear after arthroscopy.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 13;20(8):e0328299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328299. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40802781 Free PMC article.
-
Multilayer perceptron deep learning radiomics model based on Gd-BOPTA MRI to identify vessels encapsulating tumor clusters in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study.Cancer Imaging. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00895-9. Cancer Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40624579 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of DWI in preoperative assessment of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Imaging. 2014 Nov 12;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40644-014-0032-y. Cancer Imaging. 2014. PMID: 25608571 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;60(5):604-611. doi: 10.1002/uog.24967. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35656849 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Guo F, Levine L, Berenson A. Trends in the incidence of endometrial cancer among young women in the United States, 2001 to 2017. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021;39:5578. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5578 - DOI
-
- Lu KH, Broaddus RR. Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2053-64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1514010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Carlson JW, Kauderer J, Hutson A, Carter J, Armer J, Lockwood S, et al. GOG 244-The lymphedema and gynecologic cancer (LEG) study: Incidence and risk factors in newly diagnosed patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156:467-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abu-Rustum NR, Yasher CM, Arend R. Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. 2024
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical