Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel
- PMID: 39747804
- DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03833-6
Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosing and managing biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) following primary radical treatment remain a challenge. Implementing next-generation imaging (NGI) techniques has improved metastases detection. However, access to these techniques is heterogeneous, and controversies surround their use and subsequent treatment decisions. In November 2023, a multidisciplinary expert meeting was organized to discuss these aspects. This information was further reviewed in November 2024.
Areas covered: NGI-specific tracers' selection, evidence supporting patient selection for NGI after BRC, current treatment strategies in patients with BRC, and the role of NGIs in current and future therapeutic approaches.
Expert opinion: Despite improved detection performance compared to conventional imaging techniques, the application of NGIs to treatment decision-making and the impact on patient outcomes are yet to be proven. Given the lack of guidance, opinions and recommendations from multidisciplinary expert panels are valuable for diagnosing and adequately treating patients with BRC after radical treatment.
Keywords: Biochemical recurrence; Diagnosis; Management; Next-generation imaging; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Prostatic neoplasm.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Ethical approval and Informed consent: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of biochemical recurrence after primary therapy with curative intent.Curr Opin Urol. 2025 Sep 1;35(5):517-521. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001312. Epub 2025 Jul 7. Curr Opin Urol. 2025. PMID: 40625124 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perspectives of clinicians and screening candidates on shared decision-making in prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a qualitative study (PROSHADE study).BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 20;30(3):163-172. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113113. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025. PMID: 39797674 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of enzalutamide with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone for the treatment of high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in Canada.J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):766-777. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2503660. Epub 2025 May 23. J Med Econ. 2025. PMID: 40395149
-
Olaparib Monotherapy or in Combination with Abiraterone for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) and a BRCA Mutation.Target Oncol. 2025 May;20(3):445-466. doi: 10.1007/s11523-025-01146-4. Epub 2025 May 21. Target Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40397306 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x. Respir Res. 2024. PMID: 39709425 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cornford, P., Tilki, D., van den Bergh, R.C.N., Briers, E., Eberli, D., De Meerleer, G., et al. 2024. EAU - EANM - ESTRO - ESUR - ISUP - SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer . Accessed 30 Oct 2024.
-
- Flores-Fraile MC, Padilla-Fernandez BY, Valverde-Martinez S, et al. The association between prostate-specific antigen velocity (PSAV), value and acceleration, and of the free PSA/Total PSA index or ratio, with prostate conditions. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3400. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113400 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Arfi N, Gross T, Moris L, Briers E, et al. Prognostic value of biochemical recurrence following treatment with curative intent for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2019;75:967–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.011 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Moul JW, Shore ND, Pienta KJ, Czernin J, King MT, Freedland SJ. Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024;27:202–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00711-0 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Crawford ED, Koo PJ, Shore N, Slovin SF, Concepcion RS, Freedland SJ, et al. A Clinician’s guide to next generation imaging in patients with advanced prostate cancer (RADAR III). J Urol. 2019;201:682–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.164 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical