Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):9.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20990-z.

Provincial distribution of unintended pregnancy and its associated factors in Sierra Leone

Augustus Osborne  1 , Regina Mamidy Yillah  2 , Camilla Bangura  3 , Bright Opoku Ahinkorah  4   5
Affiliations

Provincial distribution of unintended pregnancy and its associated factors in Sierra Leone

Augustus Osborne et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Unintended pregnancy is a significant public health concern in Sierra Leone, with far-reaching consequences for both mothers and children. This issue impacts individual well-being, strains healthcare systems, and hinders socioeconomic development. This study examined the prevalence and factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Sierra Leone.

Methods: Data from the 2019 Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Survey was used for the study. Provincial variations in the prevalence of unintended pregnancy was presented using a spatial map. A mixed-effect multilevel binary logistic regression models was fitted to examine the factors associated with unintended pregnancy. The results were presented as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and intra-cluster correlation coefficients.

Results: In Sierra Leone, the national prevalence of unintended pregnancy was 16.4% in 2019. Women aged 20-49 exhibit lower odds of unintended pregnancy compared to those aged 15-19, with the lowest odds found among those aged 30-34. Factors associated with decreased odds include being employed, married or cohabiting, and belonging to the Fullah tribe, while living in various provinces outside the Western area also correlates with lower odds. Conversely, women with secondary education, listened to the radio, those with more children (5+), contraceptive users, larger household sizes (six or more), and those in the middle wealth index had increased odds of unintended pregnancies.

Conclusion: The results from Sierra Leone indicate that various socio-economic and demographic factors significantly influence the prevalence of unintended pregnancies, suggesting critical areas for intervention. For women in the 20-49 age group, the lower odds of unintended pregnancies compared to younger women suggest that targeted educational and health initiatives could further enhance their reproductive health outcomes. The protective factors associated with employment, marital status, and tribal affiliation highlight the importance of promoting stable family structures and economic opportunities. Also, women living in the Eastern, Northwestern, Northern, and Southern provinces, the results imply a need for province-specific interventions. These areas may require tailored outreach programs that address cultural and socio-economic barriers to contraceptive use and reproductive health education. The increased odds linked to secondary education, listening to radio, those with more children, contraceptive users, and larger household sizes suggest that educational initiatives should also address family planning and reproductive health. A focused approach that considers the unique needs of these women could lead to more effective strategies in reducing unintended pregnancies in Sierra Leone.

Keywords: Demographic and Health Survey, Public health; Sierra Leone; Unintended pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical clearance was not sought for the study since the secondary dataset used is freely available in the public domain. A detailed description of the ethical issues regarding the DHS and its dataset usage can be assessed at http://goo.gl/ny8T6X . Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Provincial prevalence of unintended pregnancy among women in Sierra Leone. Source: Authors analysis, 2024
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, Johnson BR, Tunçalp Ö, Assifi A, Sedgh G, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Bearak J. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2372–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller AB, Tunçalp Ö, Beavin C, Kwok L, Alkema L. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(9):e1152–61. - PubMed
    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, Sedgh G. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(4):e380–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bain LE, Zweekhorst MB, de Cock Buning T. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in sub–Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Afr J Reprod Health. 2020;24(2):187–205. - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Rossier C, Gerdts C, Tunçalp Ö, Johnson BR, Johnston HB. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–67. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources