Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70119.
doi: 10.1111/cts.70119.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Cannabidiol, Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, and Their Metabolites in Healthy Adults After Administration by Multiple Routes

Affiliations

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Cannabidiol, Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, and Their Metabolites in Healthy Adults After Administration by Multiple Routes

Lixuan Qian et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

The two most extensively studied cannabinoids, cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), are used for myriad conditions. THC is predominantly eliminated via the cytochromes P450 (CYPs), whereas CBD is eliminated through both CYPs and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). The fractional contributions of these enzymes to cannabinoid metabolism have shown conflicting results among studies. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for CBD and THC and for drug-drug interaction studies involving CBD or THC as object drugs were developed and verified to improve estimates of these contributions. First, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters for CBD, THC, and their metabolites (7-OH-CBD, 11-OH-THC, and 11-COOH-THC) were obtained from the literature or optimized. Second, PBPK base models were developed for CBD and THC after intravenous administration. Third, beginning with the intravenous models, absorption models were developed for CBD after oral and oromucosal spray administration and for THC after oral, inhalation, and oromucosal spray administration. The full models well-captured the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak concentration (Cmax) of CBD and THC from the verification dataset. Predicted AUC and Cmax for CBD and 7-OH-CBD were within two-fold of the observed data. For THC, 11-OH-THC, and 11-COOH-THC, 100%, 100%, and 83% of the predicted AUC values were within two-fold, respectively, of the observed values; 100%, 92%, and 94% of the predicted Cmax values, respectively, were within two-fold of the observed values. The verified models could be used to help address critical public health needs, including assessing potential drug interaction risks involving CBD and THC.

Keywords: PBPK; cannabidiol; cannabinoids; delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol; metabolites; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.D. is an employee of Simcyp Ltd/Certara, a company that provides PBPK Software. M.F.P. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Simcyp Ltd/Certara. All other authors declared no competing interests for this work.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
General workflow for cannabidiol (CBD) and delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) model development. PBPK, physiologically based pharmacokinetic; IV, intravenous; V ss, volume of distribution at steady state; CL, clearance; DDI, drug–drug interaction; PK, pharmacokinetic.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Predicted vs. observed AUC0‐t (A, C) and C max (B, D) for CBD and 7‐hydroxy‐CBD (7‐OH‐CBD) (A, B) and for THC, 11‐hydroxy‐THC (11‐OH‐THC), and 11‐nor‐9‐carboxy‐delta‐9‐THC (11‐COOH‐THC) (C, D) after administration of CBD or THC to healthy adults by multiple routes of administration.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pisanti S. and Bifulco M., “Medical Cannabis: A Plurimillennial History of an Evergreen,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 234, no. 6 (2019): 8342–8351, 10.1002/jcp.27725. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hempel B. and Xi Z. X., “Receptor Mechanisms Underlying the CNS Effects of Cannabinoids: CB(1) Receptor and Beyond,” Advances in Pharmacology 93 (2022): 275–333, 10.1016/bs.apha.2021.10.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qian L., Beers J. L., Jackson K. D., and Zhou Z., “CBD and THC in Special Populations: Pharmacokinetics and Drug‐Drug Interactions,” Pharmaceutics 16, no. 4 (2024): 484, 10.3390/pharmaceutics16040484. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrilli K., Ofori S., Hines L., Taylor G., Adams S., and Freeman T. P., “Association of Cannabis Potency With Mental Ill Health and Addiction: A Systematic Review,” Lancet Psychiatry 9, no. 9 (2022): 736–750, 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00161-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zagzoog A., Halter K., Jones A. M., et al., “The Intoxication Equivalency of 11‐Hydroxy‐Delta(9)‐Tetrahydrocannabinol (11‐OH‐THC) Relative to Delta(9)‐Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC),” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 391 (2024): 194–205, 10.1124/jpet.123.001998. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources