Treatment patterns and outcomes in secondary acute myeloid leukemia arising after hypomethylating agents: PETHEMA registry study
- PMID: 39748608
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35696
Treatment patterns and outcomes in secondary acute myeloid leukemia arising after hypomethylating agents: PETHEMA registry study
Abstract
Background: Patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia who previously received hypomethylating agents for prior myeloid neoplasms (HMA-sAML) face a dismal prognosis.
Methods: The authors analyze the characteristics, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes of patients with HMA-sAML from the Programa Español para el Tratamiento de Hemopatías Malignas (PETHEMA) registry.
Results: A total of 479 patients were included, mostly from prior myelodysplastic syndrome (84%). Frontline therapy consisted of intensive chemotherapy (IC) in 31%, low-dose cytarabine-based in 19%, supportive care and clinical trial 17% each, and HMA-based therapy in 12% and 4% in venetoclax-based regimen. Complete remission was achieved in 95 patients (27%), with higher rate among IC and venetoclax-based groups (44% and 41%, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) was 4.93 months, with 7.68 months for IC patients, 7.82 months after HMA monotherapy, and 4.66 months after venetoclax-based regimens. Patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first remission (n = 33, 9%) had a better survival outcome (median OS not reached). Multivariate analyses identified age (≥65 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group >2, higher white blood cell count, and adverse risk cytogenetic as adverse prognostic factors, whereas NPM1 mutation was a favorable factor.
Conclusions: Patients with HMA-sAML have a poor prognosis and suboptimal outcomes with conventional treatments, including BCL2 inhibitors, highlighting the need for clinical trials targeting this population.
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; hypomethylating agents; myelodysplastic syndrome; outcomes; secondary AML.
© 2025 American Cancer Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391‐2405. doi:10.1182/blood‐2016‐03‐643544
-
- Richardson DR, Green SD, Foster MC, Zeidner JF. Secondary AML emerging after therapy with hypomethylating agents: outcomes, prognostic factors, and treatment options. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021;16(1):97‐111. doi:10.1007/s11899‐021‐00608‐6
-
- Martínez‐Cuadrón D, Megías‐Vericat JE, Serrano J, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes of 2310 patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a PETHEMA registry study. Blood Adv. 2022;6(4):1278‐1295. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005335
-
- Hulegårdh E, Nilsson C, Lazarevic V, et al. Characterization and prognostic features of secondary acute myeloid leukemia in a population‐based setting: a report from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(3):208‐214. doi:10.1002/ajh.23908
-
- Short NJ, Muftuoglu M, Ong F, et al. A phase 1/2 study of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat in newly diagnosed secondary AML and in MDS or CMML after failure of hypomethylating agents. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16(1):73. doi:10.1186/s13045‐023‐01476‐8
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical