Commentary: Endoscopic Coronary Arterial Bypass: Strike A Balance
- PMID: 39748732
- PMCID: PMC11738136
- DOI: 10.5090/jcs.24.110
Commentary: Endoscopic Coronary Arterial Bypass: Strike A Balance
Abstract
See Article page 21.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Comment on
- doi: 10.5090/jcs.24.080
Similar articles
-
Hemodynamics and gas exchange during carbon dioxide insufflation for totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 May;71(5):1496-501; discussion 1501-2. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02428-6. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001. PMID: 11383789
-
Commentary on: Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting in the UK: what we believe and what we do. A Commentary on the article "Use of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) during coronary artery bypass grafting in United Kingdom: The EVH survey", Int J Surg 2019;69:146-151.Int J Surg. 2019 Oct;70:103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.032. Epub 2019 Sep 6. Int J Surg. 2019. PMID: 31499225 No abstract available.
-
Robotic advanced hybrid coronary revascularization: Outcomes with two internal thoracic artery grafts and stents.JTCVS Tech. 2022 Aug 27;16:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.08.012. eCollection 2022 Dec. JTCVS Tech. 2022. PMID: 36510526 Free PMC article.
-
Configurations and classifications of composite arterial grafts in coronary bypass surgery.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Jan;9(1):3-14. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3280110628. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008. PMID: 18268413 Review.
-
Techniques and Results of Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting: Towards More "Curative" Coronary Revascularizations.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Spring;37(1):12-21. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.09.002. Epub 2024 Oct 9. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025. PMID: 39389436 Review.
References
-
- Zacharias J, Pitsis A, Glauber M, et al. Endoscopic cardiac surgery: the path less taken. Lancet. 2024;404:1624–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02080-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02080-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, O'Brien SM, Rankin JS, Griffith BP. J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery: less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1401–10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.055. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1499–511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lim JY, Deo SV, Altarabsheh SE, et al. Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data. J Card Surg. 2015;30:125–34. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12493. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Richardson L, Richardson M, Hunter S. Is a port-access mitral valve repair superior to the sternotomy approach in accelerating postoperative recovery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7:678–83. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.180182. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.180182. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources