Commentary: Endoscopic Coronary Arterial Bypass: Strike A Balance
- PMID: 39748732
- PMCID: PMC11738136
- DOI: 10.5090/jcs.24.110
Commentary: Endoscopic Coronary Arterial Bypass: Strike A Balance
Abstract
See Article page 21.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Comment on
- doi: 10.5090/jcs.24.080
References
-
- Zacharias J, Pitsis A, Glauber M, et al. Endoscopic cardiac surgery: the path less taken. Lancet. 2024;404:1624–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02080-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02080-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, O'Brien SM, Rankin JS, Griffith BP. J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery: less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1401–10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.055. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1499–511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lim JY, Deo SV, Altarabsheh SE, et al. Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data. J Card Surg. 2015;30:125–34. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12493. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Richardson L, Richardson M, Hunter S. Is a port-access mitral valve repair superior to the sternotomy approach in accelerating postoperative recovery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7:678–83. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.180182. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.180182. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
