Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 19:15:1501400.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1501400. eCollection 2024.

The synergistic interaction effect between biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on beneficial microbial communities in soil

Affiliations

The synergistic interaction effect between biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on beneficial microbial communities in soil

Qianmei Zou et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Excessive use of chemical fertilizers and extensive farming can degrade soil properties so that leading to decline in crop yields. Combining plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) with biochar (BC) may be an alternative way to mitigate this situation. However, the proportion of PGPR and BC at which crop yield can be improved, as well as the improvement effect extent on different eco-geographic region and crops, remain unclear. This research used cabbage [Brassica pekinensis (Lour.) Rupr.] as the target crop and established as treatment conventional fertilization as a control and a 50% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer at the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China, adding BC or PGPR to evaluate the effects of different treatments on cabbage yield and the soil physicochemical properties. Specifically, high-throughput sequencing probed beneficial soil microbial communities and investigated the impact of BC and PGPR on cabbage yield and soil properties. The results revealed that the soil alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen (AH-N), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK) contents were higher in the BC application than in control. The BC application or mixed with PGPR significantly increased the soil organic matter (OM) content (P<0.05), with a maximum of 42.59 g/kg. Further, applying BC or PGPR significantly increased the abundance of beneficial soil microorganisms in the whole growth period of cabbage (P<0.05), such as Streptomyces, Lysobacter, and Bacillus. Meanwhile, the co-application of BC and PGPR increased the abundance of Pseudomonas, and also significantly enhanced the Shannon index and Simpson index of bacterial community (P<0.05). Combined or not with PGPR, the BC application significantly enhanced cabbage yield (P<0.05), with the highest yield reached 1.41 fold of the control. Our research indicated that BC is an suitable and promising carrier of PGPR for soil improvement, combining BC and PGPR can effectively ameliorate the diversity of bacterial community even in acid red soil rhizosphere, and the most direct reflection is to improve soil fertility and cabbage yield.

Keywords: beneficial microbial communities; biological agents; rhizosphere microorganisms; soil improvement; soil physicochemical properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The relative abundance of dominant groups of bacteria at the phylum level in soil samples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments in summer season Chinese cabbage and the classification. The panel (A) is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments in the mid-growth of summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel (B) is the classification of bacteria in the mid-growth of summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel (C) is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus-level in soil under different treatments at the late growth of summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel (D) is the classification of bacteria in the late growth of summer season Chinese cabbage.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments in winter season Chinese cabbage and the classification. The panel (A) is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments at the mid-growth of winter season Chinese cabbage; The panel (B) is the classification of bacteria in the mid-growth of winter season Chinese cabbage; The panel (C) is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus-level in soil under different treatments at the late growth of winter season Chinese cabbage; The panel (D) is the classification of bacteria in the late growth of winter season Chinese cabbage.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Principal component analysis (PCA) two-dimensional diagram of bacterial β-diversity in rhizosphere soil of the two season Chinese cabbage. The panel (A) is the PCA analysis map of the mid-growth period of the summer season of Chinese cabbage; The panel (B) is the PCA analysis map of the late growth period of the summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel (C) is the PCA analysis map of the mid-growth period of the winter season of Chinese cabbage; The panel (D) is the PCA analysis map of the late growth period of the winter season of Chinese cabbage.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparative analysis of cabbage yield within the same season. Error bars refer to the average value ± SD from three biological replicates. Different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (P<0.05). * indicates significance differences at the P<0.05 level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agbodjato N. A., Babalola O. O. (2024). Promoting sustainable agriculture by exploiting plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve maize and cowpea crops. PeerJ 12, e16836. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16836 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed T., Noman M., Qi Y., Shahid M., Hussain S., Masood H. A., et al. . (2023). Fertilization of microbial composts: A technology for improving stress resilience in plants. Plants (Basel). 12, 3550. doi: 10.3390/plants12203550 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alam T., Bibi F., Fatima H., Munir F., Gul A., Haider G., et al. . (2024). Biochar and PGPR: A winning combination for peanut growth and nodulation under dry spell. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s42729-024-02067-3 - DOI
    1. Bargaz A., Lyamlouli K., Chtouki M., Zeroual Y., Dhiba D. (2018). Soil microbial resources for improving fertilizers efficiency in an integrated plant nutrient management system. Front. Microbiol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01606 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolan S., Hou D., Wang L., Hale L., Egamberdieva D., Tammeorg P., et al. . (2023). The potential of biochar as a microbial carrier for agricultural and environmental applications. Sci. Total Environ. 886, 163968. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163968 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources