Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 30;10(4):e70018.
doi: 10.1002/trc2.70018. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.

Adaptive measurement of cognitive function based on multidimensional item response theory

Affiliations

Adaptive measurement of cognitive function based on multidimensional item response theory

Robert D Gibbons et al. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). .

Abstract

Introduction: Up to 20% of older adults in the United States have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and about one-third of people with MCI are predicted to transition to Alzheimer's disease (AD) within 5 years. Standard cognitive assessments are long and require a trained technician to administer. We developed the first computerized adaptive test (CAT) based on multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) to more precisely, rapidly, and repeatedly assesses cognitive abilities across the adult lifespan. We present results for a prototype CAT (pCAT-COG) for assessment of global cognitive function.

Methods: We sampled items across five cognitive domains central to neuropsychological testing (episodic memory [EM], semantic memory/language [SM], working memory [WM], executive function/flexible thinking, and processing speed [PS]). The item bank consists of 54 items, with 9 items of varying difficulty drawn from six different cognitive tasks. Each of the 54 items has 3 response trials, yielding an ordinal score (0-3 trials correct). We also include three long-term memory items not designed for adaptive administration, for a total bank of 57 items. Calibration data were collected in-person and online, calibrated using a bifactor MIRT model, and pCAT-COG scores validated against a technician-administered neuropsychological battery.

Results: The bifactor MIRT model improved fit over a unidimensional IRT model (p < 0.0001). The global pCAT-COG scores were inversely correlated with age (r = -0.44, p < 0.0001). Simulated adaptive administration of 11 items maintained a correlation of r = 0.94 with the total item bank scores. Significant differences between mild and no cognitive impairment (NCI) were found (effect size of 1.08 SD units). The pCAT-COG correlated with clinician-based global measure (r = 0.64).

Discussion: MIRT-based CAT is feasible and valid for the assessment of global cognitive impairment, laying the foundation for the development of a full CAT-COG that will draw from a much larger item bank with both global and domain specific measures of cognitive impairment.

Highlights: As Americans age, numbers at risk for developing cognitive impairment are increasing.Aging-related declines in cognition begins decades prior to the onset of obvious cognitive impairment.Traditional assessment is burdensome and requires trained clinicians.We developed an adaptive testing framework using multidimensional item response theory.It is comparable to lengthier in-person assessments that require trained psychometrists.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; bifactor model; cognitive impairment; computerized adaptive testing; multidimensional item response theory; neuropsychological assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Robert Gibbons is a founder of Adaptive Testing Technologies which licenses computerized adaptive tests for the assessment of mental health and substance use disorders and suicidality. Robert Gibbons has been an expert witness for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Gerber, and GSK. Diane Lauderdale, Robert Wilson, David Bennett, Tesnim Arar, and David Gallo have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Author disclosures are available in the Supporting Information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Bifactor model observed versus expected marginal item category proportions.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Relationship between global pCAT‐COG score and age. pCAT‐COG, prototype computerized adaptive test.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
pCAT‐COG global cognition versus RADC composite measures. pCAT‐COG, prototype computerized adaptive test; RADC, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Binary testlet versus ordinal score (0–3 correct) – Stroop.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alzheimer's Association . 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19 (4):1598‐1695. - PubMed
    1. Osler M, Christensen GT, Garde E, Mortensen EL, Christensen K. Cognitive ability in young adulthood and risk of dementia in a cohort of Danish men, brothers and twins. Alzheimers Dement. 2017; 13:1355‐1363. - PubMed
    1. Huang AR, Strombotne KL, Horner EM, Lapham SJ. Adolescent cognitive aptitudes and later‐in‐life Alzheimer disease and related disorders. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:1‐12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:1‐13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salthouse TA. When does age‐related cognition decline begin?. Neurobiol Aging, 2009;30:507‐514. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources