Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 28:20:2651-2661.
doi: 10.2147/NDT.S489365. eCollection 2024.

The Intelligence Structures of School-Age Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in China

Lin Zhu #  1 , Feiyong Jia #  2 , Aihua Cao #  3 , Yan Hao  4 , Fei Li  5 , Ruizhuo Liu  6 , Honghua Li  2 , Xiaoxiao Yu  3 , Jinzhu Zhao  4 , Feng Li  5 , Yu Zhang  1 , Yang Yu  1 , Hua Wei  1 , Ying Dai  1 , Xuan Zhang  1 , Xiao Liu  1 , Bin Peng  7 , Tingyu Li  1 , Li Chen  1
Affiliations

The Intelligence Structures of School-Age Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in China

Lin Zhu et al. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. .

Abstract

Purpose: There is no consensus on whether cognitive measures among attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes exhibit more similarities or differences, and most of them have been conducted on English-speaking subjects, lacking cross-cultural perspectives. The present study was aimed at investigating the intelligence structures of school-age children with ADHD who speak Chinese, using a multicenter and large sample size approach, offering some references for clinicians.

Patients and methods: 772 children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD took part in the cross-sectional study. All participants underwent the Chinese Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition assessment. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics 24 was used for statistical analyses.

Results: No significant differences were found in full intelligence quotient (FIQ), verbal IQ (VIQ), performance quotient (PIQ), as well as most subtest scores among ADHD subtypes. The analysis of variance showed that the boys' scores were higher than girls' scores in PIQ (P < 0.05), information (P < 0.01), vocabulary (P < 0.05) and block design (P<0.01) from the perspective of sex, but lower in the coding (P < 0.01). From the perspective of age, the senior group (aged 9-12) scored higher in block design (P < 0.01) and object assembly (P < 0.05) than the junior one (aged 6-8), but lower in VIQ (P < 0.05) and verbal comprehension (VC) factor.

Conclusion: Our study supported that ADHD substyles shared more similarities in intelligence structures. Boys outperformed girls in PIQ and some subtests, suggesting that the importance to consider the gender differences and the distribution of intellectual strengths and weaknesses. Older children outperformed in block design and object assembly, but underperformed in VIQ and VC factor. This indicated the need to focus on language development and screen for specific learning disabilities in managing school-age children with ADHD.

Keywords: ADHD; intellectual strengths and weaknesses; intelligence structures; language development; school-age children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the participant recruitment process in this multi-center study in China.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The mean± standard deviation of the subtest scores for different sexes (* means P<0.05, ** means P<0.01).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The mean± standard deviation of the FIQ, VIQ and PIQ for different sexes (* means P<0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The mean± standard deviation of the subtest scores for different ages (* means P<0.05, ** means P<0.01).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The mean± standard deviation of the FIQ, VIQ and PIQ for different ages (* means P<0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Developmental Behavioral Group, Pediatrics Society of Chinese Medical Association. Early recognition, standardized diagnosis and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Chin J Pediatr. 2020;58(3):188–193. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolraich ML, Hagan JF Jr, Allan C, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2019;144(4):e20192528. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-2528 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang T, Liu K, Li Z, et al. Prevalence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):32. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1187-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moura O, Costa P, Simões MR. WISC-III cognitive profiles in children with ADHD: specific cognitive impairments and diagnostic utility. J Gen Psychol. 2019;146(3):258–282. doi:10.1080/00221309.2018.1561410 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Çelik C, Erden G, Özmen S, Tural Hesapçıoğlu S. Comparing two editions of Wechsler Intelligence Scales and assessing reading skills in children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2017;28(2):104–116. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources