Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 31;12(1):20240014.
doi: 10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Normative reference interval for youths on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)

Affiliations

Normative reference interval for youths on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)

Christine Lykke Thoustrup et al. Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is widely used in both clinical and non-clinical research to assess emotional regulation difficulties. To guide interpretation of scores, establishing thresholds for normative DERS scores is informative. However, despite its widespread use, to date no study has provided such threshold for youths. This literature review aimed to fill this gap by examining the 90% reference interval for the DERS in youths aged 11-19 years.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed (MEDLINE) on 12 March 2024, to identify studies reporting DERS-36 total scores (DERS-T) in youths aged 11-19 years from either community-based populations or healthy volunteers.

Results: A total of 34 studies were included; 20 studies included community-based participants (n = 6,960), while the remaining 14 studies included healthy volunteers (n = 766), resulting in a total of 7,726 participants. The 90% reference interval for DERS-T from all included participants had a threshold of 121.8 normative emotion regulation in youths.

Conclusion and significance: This threshold is considerably higher than DERS-T scores reported in most clinical studies and a substantial variation in reference intervals across studies is observed. We identify five main methodological factors related to the DERS-36 and discuss their potential impact on the validity, reliability, and generalizability of findings. Given the DERS-T range of 36-180, we conclude that the 90% reference interval derived from our review is not sufficiently robust to guide clinical or scientific interpretations. Our work is not exhaustive, and further research is needed to validate and test the reliability of this reference interval.

Keywords: Emotion regulation; Youths; reference interval; the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Reference interval for DERS-T in youths from community-based populations and healthy volunteers. The range for the DERS-T is 36 to 180. The reference interval for Community stems from studies using background population data including youths experiencing heightened levels of psychopathology. The reference interval for healthy volunteers stem from studies including youths as symptom-free and psychiatrically healthy. The black reference intervals represent the dispersion of DERS-T from individual studies. The blue reference intervals represent the combined dispersion from three groups respectively: Community-based population (46.0–122.9), healthy volunteers (43.6–109.4), and all (45.5–121.8).

Similar articles

References

    1. Aldao A, Gee DG, De Los Reyes A, Seager I. Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic factor in the development of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology: Current and future directions. Dev Psychopathol. 2016 NaN;28:927–46. - PubMed
    1. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41–54.
    1. Penner F, Steinberg L, Sharp C. The Development and Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-8: Providing Respondents with a Uniform Context That Elicits Thinking About Situations Requiring Emotion Regulation. J Pers Assess. 2023 NaN 3;105(5):657–66. - PubMed
    1. Bjureberg J, Ljótsson B, Tull MT, Hedman E, Sahlin H, Lundh G. Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016;38(2):284–96. m.fl. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Victor SE, Klonsky ED. Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-18) in Five Samples. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016 NaN;38(4):582–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources