Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Apr;172(4):1164-1176.
doi: 10.1002/ohn.1109. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Stapedotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Stapedotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ebraheem Albazee et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic stapedotomy in patients with otosclerosis.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL.

Review methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed for bias using Cochrane's instrument. The specific outcomes included the mean duration of surgery, the mean gain in air-bone gap (ABG), and the rates of chorda tympani nerve (CTN) injury, CTN manipulation, facial nerve (FN) injury, tympanic membrane (TM) perforation, dysgeusia, dizziness, and pain score. Continuous data were analyzed using mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), and dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Eleven RCTs with 515 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference between both groups in the mean duration of surgery (MD = -10.42, 95% CI [-26.26, 5.43]), mean gain in ABG (MD = 1.04, 95% CI [-0.48, 2.57]), CTN injury (RR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.20, 1.04]), FN injury (RR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.11, 9.27]), TM perforation (RR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.23, 4.25]), and dizziness (RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.41, 1.53]). However, endoscopic stapedotomy significantly reduced the need for CTN manipulation (RR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.35, 0.96]), dysgeusia (RR = 0.33, 95% CI [0.19, 0.57]), and pain score (SMD = -1.59, 95% CI [-2.22, -0.97]).

Conclusion: Endoscopic stapedotomy significantly reduces dysgeusia, CTN manipulation, and pain compared to microscopic stapedotomy, with similar surgery durations, audiometric gains, and comparable risks of CTN injury, TM perforation, FN injury, and dizziness.

Keywords: endoscopic; meta‐analysis; microscopic; otosclerosis; stapedotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Batson L, Rizzolo D. Otosclerosis: an update on diagnosis and treatment. JAAPA. 2017;30(2):17‐22. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000511784.21936.1b
    1. Ojha T, Sharma K, Chhabra B, Trivedi BB, Bansal M. Endoscopic stapedotomy: overcoming limitations and improving surgical outcomes. Indian J Otol. 2023;29(3):158‐163. doi:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_69_22
    1. Bennett ML, Zhang D, Labadie RF, Noble JH. Comparison of middle ear visualization with endoscopy and microscopy. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(4):362‐366. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000988
    1. Liktor B, Szekanecz Z, Batta TJ, Sziklai I, Karosi T. Perspectives of pharmacological treatment in otosclerosis. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2013;270(3):793‐804. doi:10.1007/s00405-012-2126-0
    1. Das A, Mitra S, Ghosh D, Sengupta A. Endoscopic stapedotomy: overcoming limitations of operating microscope. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(2):103‐109. doi:10.1177/0145561319862216

LinkOut - more resources