Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 3:57:jrm40441.
doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.40441.

Development of the Italian version of the Motricity Index and evaluation of its reliability in adults with stroke

Affiliations

Development of the Italian version of the Motricity Index and evaluation of its reliability in adults with stroke

Diego Longo et al. J Rehabil Med. .

Abstract

Background: The Motricity Index (MI) is a commonly used method of measuring muscle strength in post-stroke hemiparesis. This study aimed to produce the MI Italian version (MI-IT) and assess its reliability in subjects with stroke.

Methods: Phase-1: stepwise approach to MI-IT production and pilot-testing with 10 health professionals to ensure clarity of each item and instructions for administration and scoring. Phase-2: evaluation of MI-IT reliability on stroke subjects, each independently assessed by 2 raters randomly selected from a group of 10 physiotherapists; the first rater re-administered the MI-IT 1-3 days later. Intraclass correlation coefficients, Spearman's rho and, limited to the more affected side, non-parametric limits of agreement (LOA) were computed for total MI-IT scores, squared weighted kappa and percentage of observed agreement for individual item scores.

Results: The back-translated versions showed no discrepancies with original MI, but 3 items were revised after pilot-testing. Complete data on 50 (test-retest) and 51 (inter-rater) participants demonstrated excellent reliability of all MI-IT total scores on the more affected side (Spearman's rho range: test-retest 0.953-0.975; inter-rater: 0.965-0.970), with LOA ranging from 9-25%), but poor inter-rater reliability for some scores on the less affected side (Spearman's rho range: test-retest, 0.816-0.976; inter-rater: 0.508-0.721). Moderate to almost perfect agreement was found for all individual item scores, except for 2 items on the less affected side.

Conclusions: The MI-IT is sufficiently reliable to evaluate motor impairment of the more affected side after stroke, with acceptable measurement error for all scores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland–Altman plots showing the median of the differences and non-parametric limits of agreement for the more affected side MI-IT total scores.

References

    1. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382–399. 10.1159/000115178 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Compston A. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Medical Research Council: Nerve Injuries Research Committee. London: HMSO; 1942; pp. 48 (iii) and 74 figures and 7 diagrams; with aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. By Michael O’Brien for the Guarantors of Brain. Saunders Elsevier: 2010; pp. [8] 64 and 94 Figures. Brain J Neurol 2010; 133: 2838–2844. 10.1093/brain/awq270 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 576–579. 10.1136/jnnp.53.7.576 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 6–9. 10.3109/03790799009166594 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, Nichols D, Rose DK, Yoshida R, et al. . Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 1383–1396. 10.2522/ptj.20120492 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources