Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):162-170.
doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae132.

Blood Culture Contamination and Diagnostic Stewardship: From a Clinical Laboratory Quality Monitor to a National Patient Safety Measure

Affiliations
Review

Blood Culture Contamination and Diagnostic Stewardship: From a Clinical Laboratory Quality Monitor to a National Patient Safety Measure

Jake D Bunn et al. J Appl Lab Med. .

Abstract

Laboratory analysis of blood cultures is vital to the accurate and timely diagnosis of bloodstream infections. However, the reliability of the test depends on clinical compliance with standard operating procedures that limit the risk of inconclusive or incorrect results. False-negative blood culture results due to inadequate volumes of blood can result in misdiagnosis, delay therapy, and increase patients' risk of developing or dying from bloodstream infections. Likewise, commonly occurring bacteria or fungi on human skin (i.e., commensal organisms) can contaminate the blood culture during collection and increase the risk of false positives, compromising care and leading to unnecessary antibiotic therapy and prolonged hospitalization. In December 2022, a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) consensus-based entity (CBE) endorsed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) proposal for a new patient safety measure to address these concerns. CDC developed this quality measure to promote the standardization of blood culture best practices and improve laboratory diagnosis of bloodstream infections nationally. This special report will emphasize the importance of standardizing blood culture collection and describe the need for a national patient safety measure, new quality tools, and next steps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ Disclosures or Potential Conflicts of Interest: Upon manuscript submission, all authors completed the author disclosure form.

References

    1. Kirn TJ, Weinstein MP. Update on blood cultures: how to obtain, process, report, and interpret. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:513–20. - PubMed
    1. US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). § 493.1291 Standard: test report. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-IV/subchapter-G/part-493/s... (Accessed September 2024).
    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M100 Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 34th Ed. https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/ (Accessed September 2024).
    1. Snyder SR, Favoretto AM, Baetz RA, Derzon JH, Madison BM, Mass D, et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem 2012;45:999–1011. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doern GV, Carroll KC, Diekema DJ, Garey KW, Rupp ME, Weinstein MP, Sexton DJ. Practical guidance for clinical microbiology laboratories: a comprehensive update on the problem of blood culture contamination and a discussion of methods for addressing the problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 2019;33:e00009–19. - PMC - PubMed