Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;14(1):e70560.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.70560.

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Survival Outcomes in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Results From the NIFTY Trial

Affiliations

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Survival Outcomes in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Results From the NIFTY Trial

So Heun Lee et al. Cancer Med. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have explored the role of vitamin D in various cancers; however, its impact on advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) within a prospective cohort remains to be investigated. This preplanned subgroup analysis of the NIFTY trial evaluated the prognostic implications of serum vitamin D levels in patients with advanced BTC undergoing second-line chemotherapy.

Methods: From the 174 patients in the NIFTY trial, a total of 173 patients (99.4%) were included in this analysis comparing a liposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/leucovorin group (n = 87) and a 5-FU/leucovorin alone group (n = 86). Baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, an indicator of vitamin D status, were analyzed for their association with baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing second-line chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and a restricted cubic spline function were used to assess the association with OS.

Results: There were no significant associations between baseline characteristics and serum 25(OH)D levels. Baseline serum 25(OH)D levels were not associated with OS in either the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression or restricted cubic spline analysis. In the subgroup analysis, however, higher serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly associated with poorer OS in female patients, while no significant association was observed in male patients, indicating a significant interaction by sex. Additionally, a marginally significant interaction was observed between body mass index and serum 25(OH)D levels for OS, with higher levels associated with better OS in patients who were underweight.

Conclusions: Our preplanned subgroup analysis of the NIFTY trial indicates that the serum 25(OH)D levels did not have a significant effect on OS in the overall patient population with advanced BTC. However, higher serum 25(OH)D levels were associated with worse OS in female patients, underscoring the need for further investigation into the role of vitamin D in BTC.

Keywords: NIFTY trial; biliary tract cancer; overall survival; vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data management, data analysis, data interpretation, or the writing of the report.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Restricted cubic spline analysis of the association between serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D levels and overall survival. (A) Unadjusted (B) Adjusted. Adjusted for treatment, age, sex, ECOG PS, BMI, primary tumor location, disease status, metastatic sites (liver, lung, bone, peritoneal seeding, lymph node, soft tissue, others), and baseline CA 19‐9 level. Abbreviations: HR = hazard ratio; CI, confidence Interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; BMI, body mass index.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Subgroup analysis of serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D levels and overall survival stratified by sex. (A) Male (B) Female. Adjusted for treatment, age, ECOG PS, BMI, primary tumor location, disease status, metastatic sites (liver, lung, bone, peritoneal seeding, lymph node, soft tissue, others), and baseline CA 19–9 level. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence Interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; BMI, body mass index.

Similar articles

References

    1. Yoo C., Hyung J., and Chan S. L., “Recent Advances in Systemic Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma,” Liver Cancer 13 (2023): 1–1, 135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lamarca A., Edeline J., McNamara M. G., et al., “Current Standards and Future Perspectives in Adjuvant Treatment for Biliary Tract Cancers,” Cancer Treatment Reviews 84 (2020): 101936, 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101936. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oh D. Y., Ruth He A., Qin S., et al., “Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer,” NEJM Evidence 1, no. 8 (2022): 1–11, 10.1056/EVIDoa2200015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelley R. K., Ueno M., Yoo C., et al., “Pembrolizumab in Combination With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Compared With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Alone for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (KEYNOTE‐966): A Randomised, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Phase 3 Trial,” Lancet 401, no. 10391 (2023): 1853–1865, 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoo C., Kim K. P., Jeong J. H., et al., “Liposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Versus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer After Progression on Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin (NIFTY): A Multicentre, Open‐Label, Randomised, Phase 2b Study,” Lancet Oncology 22, no. 11 (2021): 1560–1572, 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00486-1. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding