Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16551.
doi: 10.1111/ene.16551.

Carotid endarterectomy and the risk of perioperative stroke: The importance of chronic ischaemic lesions and small vessel disease

Affiliations
Observational Study

Carotid endarterectomy and the risk of perioperative stroke: The importance of chronic ischaemic lesions and small vessel disease

Henrietta Törmänen et al. Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Perioperative stroke is a well-recognized complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but well-performing prediction models do not exist for it. Our aim was to identify novel predictors for perioperative ischaemic cerebrovascular events (iCVEs), emphasizing cerebrovascular imaging and potential biomarkers for stroke in carotid stenosis (CS) patients in a well-characterized prospective CS cohort.

Methods: Helsinki Carotid Endarterectomy Study 2 is an observational prospective and consecutive cohort study of CS patients subjected to CEA during 2012-2015. The associations between perioperative stroke and transient ischaemic attack (iCVEs) and potential predictive factors were evaluated by univariate and Cox regression analyses.

Results: Of 488 operated CS patients, 33 (7%) sustained an iCVE including 21 (4%) ischaemic strokes. In univariate analysis, moderate ipsilateral CS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-4.23), covert or chronic ipsilateral brain infarct in imaging (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.09-4.76) and severe cerebral small vessel disease (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.04-10.88) appeared as novel risk factors for perioperative iCVE. In Cox proportional hazards regression modelling, female gender (HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.30-7.04), a history of coronary heart disease (HR 3.59, 95% CI 1.52-8.47), covert or chronic ipsilateral infarct (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.01-5.34) and severe small vessel disease (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.07-6.47) were the strongest independent predictors of perioperative iCVE.

Conclusions: In addition to the previously reported clinical risk factors, it was found that imaging markers of past cerebrovascular disease, covert or chronic ipsilateral infarct and severe small vessel disease, and moderate ipsilateral stenosis are associated with perioperative iCVEs.

Keywords: carotid stenosis; perioperative stroke; small vessel disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of the study. Reasons for withdrawing the decision for CEA: recurrent disabling stroke (n = 1), progression to total carotid occlusion (n = 2), no significant stenosis (n = 3), carotid aneurysm filled with thrombus (n = 1), thrombectomy (n = 1), dilation operation (n = 1), symptoms were not derived from carotid artery stenosis (n = 1), stenosis at carotid siphon combined with pre‐stenotic collapse (n = 1) and general weakness (n = 1). AP, angina pectoris; CEA, carotid endarterectomy; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; iCVE, ischaemic cerebrovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

Similar articles

References

    1. Naylor R, Rantner B, Ancetti S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;202365(1):7‐111. - PubMed
    1. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid‐artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):11‐23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (international carotid stenting study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9719):985‐997. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1660‐1671. - PubMed
    1. Bonati LH, Dobson J, Algra A, et al. Short‐term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta‐analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1062‐1073. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources