Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;47(3):3147-3161.
doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01477-6. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

Complex genetic interactions affect susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease risk in the BIN1 and MS4A6A loci

Affiliations

Complex genetic interactions affect susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease risk in the BIN1 and MS4A6A loci

Alireza Nazarian et al. Geroscience. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Genetics is the second strongest risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) after age. More than 70 loci have been implicated in AD susceptibility so far, and the genetic architecture of AD entails both additive and nonadditive contributions from these loci. To better understand nonadditive impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on AD risk, we examined individual, joint, and interacting (SNPxSNP) effects of 139 and 66 SNPs mapped to the BIN1 and MS4A6A AD-associated loci, respectively. The analyses were conducted by fitting three respective dominant allelic-effect models using data from four independent studies. Joint effects were analyzed by considering pairwise combinations of genotypes of the selected SNPs, i.e., compound genotypes (CompG). The individual SNP analyses showed associations of 18 BIN1 SNPs and 4 MS4A6A SNPs with AD. We identified 589 BIN1 and 217 MS4A6A SNP pairs associated with AD in the CompG analysis, although their individual SNPs were not linked to AD independently. Notably, 34 BIN1 and 10 MS4A6A SNP pairs exhibited both significant SNPxSNP interaction effects and significant CompG effects. The vast majority of nonadditive effects were captured through the CompG analysis. These results expand the current understanding of the contributions of the BIN1 and MS4A6A loci to AD susceptibility. The identified nonadditive effects suggest a significant genetic modulation mechanism underlying the genetic heterogeneity of AD in these loci. Our findings highlight the importance of considering nonadditive genetic impacts on AD risk beyond the traditional SNPxSNP approximation, as they may uncover critical mechanisms not apparent when examining SNPs individually.

Keywords: Aging; Alzheimer’s disease; Compound genotypes; Dementia; Genetic associations; Genetic heterogeneity; Genetic interactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study does not involve gathering data from human subjects directly. Instead, it focuses on secondary analysis of data obtained from dbGaP, NIAGADS, and the UK Biobank. The data were accessed with the approval of the Duke University Institutional Review Board (IRB) [protocols: Pro00105245-INIT-1.0 (06/26/2020), Pro00105247-INIT-1.0 (06/26/2020), and Pro00105346-INIT-1.0 (04/15/2020)], and all analyses were performed under IRB guidelines. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Volcano plot for CompG analyses of the 9591 SNP pairs mapped to the BIN1 gene locus on chromosome 2q14.3. The x-axis displays CompG regression beta coefficients, and the y-axis shows the respective minus-logarithm-base-10 of SGoF-adjusted P-values. The dashed line indicates the significance threshold [i.e., − log10(PSGoF = 0.05) = 1.3]. The red dots above the cutoff line indicate significant CompG effects whose comprising SNPs were not associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) individually. The blue dots above the cutoff line denote significant CompG effects, in which one or both comprising SNPs were associated with AD individually. The light-gray or dark-gray dots below the cutoff line show non-significant CompG effects, in which none or at least one of the comprising SNPs were associated with AD individually
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Volcano plot for CompG analyses of the 2145 SNP pairs mapped to the MS4A6A gene locus on chromosome 11q12.2. The x-axis displays CompG regression beta coefficients, and the y-axis shows the respective minus-logarithm-base-10 of SGoF-adjusted P-values. The dashed line indicates the significance threshold [i.e., − log10(PSGoF = 0.05) = 1.3]. The red dots above the cutoff line indicate significant CompG effects whose comprising SNPs were not associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) individually. The blue dots above the cutoff line denote significant CompG effects, in which one or both comprising SNPs were associated with AD individually. The light-gray or dark-gray dots below the cutoff line show non-significant CompG effects, in which none or at least one of the comprising SNPs were associated with AD individually

References

    1. Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2022;2022(18):700–89. - PubMed
    1. Marques SCF, Oliveira CR, Outeiro TF, Pereira CMF. Alzheimer’s disease: the quest to understand complexity. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21:373–83. - PubMed
    1. Combarros O, Cortina-Borja M, Smith AD, Lehmann DJ. Epistasis in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:1333–49. - PubMed
    1. Wang H, Bennett DA, De Jager PL, Zhang Q-Y, Zhang H-Y. Genome-wide epistasis analysis for Alzheimer’s disease and implications for genetic risk prediction. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13:55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nazarian A, Loika Y, He L, Culminskaya I, Kulminski AM. Genome-wide analysis identified abundant genetic modulators of contributions of the apolipoprotein E alleles to Alzheimer’s disease risk. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2022;18:2067–78. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources