Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning
- PMID: 39752015
- DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04342-9
Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning
Abstract
Purposes: Intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.
Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of ≤ 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. Patient's age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were recorded. Patients are categorized into no cancer, very low, low-, and intermediate-risk categories. The relationship between the model and IR PCa was investigated using binary generalized linear model (GLM) and assessed its discriminatory ability by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: Among 729 patients, PCa was detected in 234 individuals (32.1%), with 120 (16.5%) diagnosed with IR PCa. The AUC for the novel model compared to the clinical model was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.722-0.889) versus 0.669 (95% CI: 0.543-0.790), with a p-value of 0.018. In DCA, the GLM outperformed the clinical model by over 7%, potentially allowing for an additional 44.3% reduction in unnecessary biopsies. The PSAD emerged as the most significant predictor.
Conclusion: We developed a GLM utilizing pre-biopsy features to predict IR PCa. The model demonstrated good discrimination and clinical applicability, which could assist urologists in determining the necessity of a prostate biopsy.
Keywords: Diagnosis; Intermediate-risk; Machine learning; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: Written informed consent was not required for this study, as the database contained only anonymous patient data with no identifying information. The research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Clinical Center Kragujevac on January 17, 2658. All ethical guidelines set forth in the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki for medical research involving human participants were adhered to.
Similar articles
-
Predictive clinical characteristics for adverse pathological outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer during biopsy.Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May 25. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04577-0. Online ahead of print. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 40415146
-
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA significantly improves the prediction of prostate cancer at initial extended prostate biopsies in patients with total PSA between 2.0 and 10 ng/ml: results of a prospective study in a clinical setting.Eur Urol. 2011 Aug;60(2):214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.052. Epub 2011 Apr 5. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21482022
-
Peripheral zone PSA density: a predominant variable to improve prostate cancer detection efficiency in men with PSA higher than 4 ng ml-1.Asian J Androl. 2021 Jul-Aug;23(4):415-420. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_72_20. Asian J Androl. 2021. PMID: 33473011 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of the transition zone index for identification of prostate cancer in Chinese men with intermediate PSA levels.Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):807-15. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0119-3. Epub 2012 Feb 5. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22311386
-
Evaluation of prostate specific antigen density and transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in 100 consecutive patients with a negative digital rectal examination and intermediate serum prostate specific antigen levels.Int J Urol. 1997 Jul;4(4):362-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1997.tb00209.x. Int J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9256325 Review.
References
-
- Shao YH, Demissie K, Shih W et al (2009) Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1280–1283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp262 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Fletcher SA, von Landenberg N, Cole AP et al (2020) Contemporary national trends in prostate cancer risk profile at diagnosis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 23(1):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-019-0157-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Preisser F, Cooperberg MR, Crook J et al (2020) Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Stratification and Management. Eur Urol Oncol 3(3):270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2020.03.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nayan M, Carvalho FLF, Feldman AS (2022) Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. World J Urol 40(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03893-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baboudjian M, Breda A, Rajwa P et al (2022) Active Surveillance for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Metaregression. Eur Urol Oncol 5(6):617–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2022.07.004 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous