Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 4;27(1):2.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02163-x.

Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Affiliations
Review

Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Song Peng Ang et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review assesses the outcomes of coronary interventions in patients with liver cirrhosis and coronary artery disease (CAD), focusing on the clinical challenges posed by cirrhosis-related hemodynamic and coagulopathic changes. It highlights essential considerations for managing these patients, who have an increased risk of adverse events during coronary procedures.

Recent findings: Recent studies have shown that patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing PCI experience significantly higher mortality rates compared to non-cirrhotic patients, particularly in the context of STEMI and NSTEMI. Coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia increase the risk of bleeding and vascular complications during interventions. Radial access has been suggested as a safer alternative to femoral access in these patients due to reduced bleeding complications. Additionally, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a prevalent risk, with cirrhotic patients demonstrating higher rates of acute kidney injury post-PCI. Preventive strategies such as minimizing contrast exposure and utilizing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are recommended. Managing CAD in cirrhotic patients requires careful consideration of their unique pathophysiological state. Higher in-hospital mortality, bleeding risks, and vascular complications necessitate tailored procedural strategies, such as radial access and contrast minimization. The balance between thrombotic and bleeding risks is critical in decision-making, with IVUS and hydration strategies being promising approaches. Further research is required to optimize treatment protocols and improve long-term outcomes for this high-risk population.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Bleeding; Chronic liver disease; Cirrhosis; Coronary intervention; Outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

    1. Organization WH. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases....
    1. Mukherjee D. Is percutaneous coronary intervention now the default revascularization strategy for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis? J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7):e025748. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415–537. - PubMed
    1. Huang DQ, Terrault NA, Tacke F, Gluud LL, Arrese M, Bugianesi E, et al. Global epidemiology of cirrhosis - aetiology, trends and predictions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;20(6):388–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffin C, Agbim U, Ramani A, Shankar N, Kanwal F, Asrani SK. Underestimation of cirrhosis-related mortality in the Medicare Eligible Population, 1999–2018. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(1):223–e53. - PubMed

MeSH terms