Synergistic effects of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and immunotherapy for brain tumor recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39756615
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101629
Synergistic effects of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and immunotherapy for brain tumor recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Erratum in
-
Addendum to "Synergistic effects of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and immunotherapy for brain tumor recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis" [Neurochir. 71 (2025), 101629] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101629.Neurochirurgie. 2025 Mar;71(2):101648. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101648. Epub 2025 Feb 25. Neurochirurgie. 2025. PMID: 40010199 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: The confluence of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with immunotherapeutic approaches represents a promising option for managing recurrent brain lesions. However, the potential synergy between these modalities is still unclear. This meta-analysis examines the literature to elucidate the adverse effects and overall survival associated with this combination in treating recurrent brain metastases and glioblastoma.
Methods: Systematic searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria comprised studies investigating the combined utilization of LITT with immunotherapy, among adult patients diagnosed with recurrent brain metastases and recurrent glioblastoma. Our analysis, using a random-effects model, pooled Overall Survival (OS) and Adverse events (AEs) from all the included studies.
Results: We analyzed 162 patients from one RCT and three non-randomized studies. The pooled analysis of all patients revealed a median OS of 12.8 months (95% CI = 8.31-17.31; p < 0.01) with the combined treatment of LITT and immunotherapy. Similarly, approximately 6% of patients experienced AEs (95% CI = -0.01-0.11; p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis further demonstrated that among patients with recurrent glioma, the combined treatment showed pooled OS of 11 months (95% CI = 7.13-16.62; p < 0.01), while AEs were observed in 4% of patients (95% CI = -0.02-0.10; p = 0.21).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed a potentially comparable safety profile and overall survival to conventional treatment modalities. Further research is warranted to test differences in the incidence of AEs and OS from LITT with immunotherapy versus a control.
Keywords: Immunotherapy; Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT); Meta-analysis; Recurrent brain cancer; Synergy.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest All authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest. All authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
