Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;47(3):159-168.
doi: 10.1177/01939459241310402. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

Implementing Oncologic Nursing Care Plans in Electronic Health Records With Two Taxonomies: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Implementing Oncologic Nursing Care Plans in Electronic Health Records With Two Taxonomies: A Pilot Study

Serena Togni et al. West J Nurs Res. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Nursing care plans document the nursing process, displaying actions, and illustrating expected outcomes. Their integration into electronic health records (EHRs) is critical for accurate documentation, enhanced by standardized nursing terminologies that promote communication, critical reasoning, and patient safety through consistent language for information.

Objective: This study aimed to identify appropriate standardized nursing terminology tailored to the context of a Northern Italian Cancer Center and research facility for developing nursing care plans and starting their integration into institutional EHRs.

Methods: Participatory action research was conducted to select proper terminology respecting the oncological setting, develop nursing care plans, and start their implementation in EHRs. The nursing team of a pilot ward collaborated closely with the researchers as coresearchers. Care plan samples were presented using the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association-International Nursing Intervention Classification, Nursing Outcomes Classification, and International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) in the test section of the EHRs to gather nurses' preferences. Quantitative data collection, focus groups, and survey analyses were conducted.

Results: Nurses chose the ICNP for its flexibility but sought better methods to define patient severity in assessments and outcomes. They suggested incorporating the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to enable context-sensitive care plans.

Conclusions: End-user involvement is essential for developing EHRs, enhancing system usability, and reducing implementation resistance. Including nurses in management decisions empowers them, and improves care quality.

Keywords: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; International Classification for Nursing Practice; electronic health records; nursing care plans; oncology nursing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study phases flow diagram.

References

    1. Rabelo-Silva ER, Dantas Cavalcanti AC, Ramos Goulart Caldas MC, et al. Advanced nursing process quality: comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). J Clin Nurs. 2016;26:379-387. doi:10.1111/jocn.13387 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Törnvall E, Jansson I. Preliminary evidence for the usefulness of standardized nursing terminologies in different fields of application: a literature review. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2017;28(2):109-119. doi:10.1111/2047-3095.12123 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hardiker NR, Dowding D, Dykes PC, Sermeus W. Reinterpreting the nursing record for an electronic context. Int J Med Inf. 2019;127:120-126. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Björvell C, Jansson I, Busck-Håkans V, Karlsson I. Creating subsets of International Classification for Nursing Practice precoordinated concepts: diagnoses/outcomes and interventions categorized into areas of nursing practice. CIN Comput Inform Nurs. 2024;42(1):21-26. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001072 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Groot K, Triemstra M, Paans W, Francke AL. Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(7):1379-1393. doi:10.1111/jan.13919 - DOI - PubMed