Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices
- PMID: 39758082
- PMCID: PMC11694631
- DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2025-0007
Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates the differences in patient care across various organisational forms of general practitioners (GPs) in Upper Austria.
Methods: Data was collected from GPs across Upper Austria, examining patient demographics, prescription patterns, staff employment, services offered and the proximity of practices to hospitals. The variability in recording patient visit reasons was also analysed.
Results: Of the 30 participating GPs (Response Rate 5.1%), 17 worked in single practices, 7 in group practices, and 6 in PHC units. In our sample, single practices tend to prescribe more medications for chronic conditions. Group practices and PHC centres are more prevalent in areas with larger populations, offer online appointment bookings more frequently and employ more staff. The study also highlights variability in documenting patient visit reasons, emphasising the need for standardised documentation practices. The most common reasons for the patient to contact their GP, based on ICPC-2 categories, were general and non-specific, respiratory and locomotor problems, and the most common chronic diseases seen in the practice are cardiovascular, endocrine diseases and locomotor system problems. The most common therapeutic procedures were counselling and prescription of medication.
Conclusion: Our study, the first of its kind, reveals significant insights into the variability and adaptability of general medicine outpatient practices in Upper Austria, highlighting the need for improved diagnosis coding at the primary care level.
Uvod: Raziskava se osredotoča na razlike v oskrbi bolnikov pri različnih organizacijskih oblikah dela splošnih oziroma družinskih zdravnikov (GP) v Zgornji Avstriji.
Metode: Podatke so prispevali splošni zdravniki iz Zgornje Avstrije, pri čemer so nas zanimale predvsem naslednje informacije: demografska struktura bolnikov, najpogostejši razlogi za obiske, predpisovanje zdravil, kadrovska zasedba v ambulantah, storitve, ki jih zdravniki opravljajo v svojih ambulantah, ter lokacija ambulante glede na bližino bolnišnice.
Rezultati: Od 30 sodelujočih zdravnikov (odzivnost 5,1-odstotna) jih 17 dela v samostojnih praksah, 7 v skupinskih praksah in 6 v zdravstvenih centrih (PHC). Zdravniki v samostojnih praksah so predpisovali več zdravil za kronične bolezni. Skupinske prakse in PHC so pogostejši na območjih z večjim številom prebivalcev, pogosteje omogočajo spletno naročanje in zaposlujejo več osebja. Študija prav tako izpostavlja raznolikost pri dokumentiranju razlogov za obiske bolnikov, kar poudarja potrebo po standardizaciji dokumentacije. Glede na ICPC-2 kodirni sistem, so najpogostejši razlogi, zaradi katerih pacienti obiščejo svojega družinskega zdravnika sledeči: splošne in nespecifične težave, težave z dihalnim sistemom ter gibalne težave. Najpogostejša kronična obolenja, ki jih zdravniki obravnavajo v praksi, so bolezni srca in ožilja, endokrine bolezni ter težave z gibalnim sistemom. Najpogostejši terapevtski postopki pa so svetovanje in predpisovanje zdravil.
Zaključek: Naša študija, prva te vrste v Zgornji Avstriji, omogoča vpogled v raznolikost delovanja in organizacije splošnih ambulant v tej regiji. Prav tako izpostavlja potrebo po izboljšanju kodiranja diagnoz na primarni ravni zdravstvene oskrbe.
Keywords: Organisational; Primary healthcare, general/family medicine; Scope of activities; Upper Austria; type of practice.
© 2025 Erika ZELKO et al., published by Sciendo.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.
Similar articles
-
Primary health care teams put to the test a cross-sectional study from Austria within the QUALICOPC project.BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Nov 16;16:168. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0384-9. BMC Fam Pract. 2015. PMID: 26572224 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12):B5405. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 29206099
-
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39324475 Review.
-
Comparison of rural and urban French GPs' activity: a cross-sectional study.Rural Remote Health. 2021 Sep;21(3):5865. doi: 10.22605/RRH5865. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Rural Remote Health. 2021. PMID: 34469693
-
Digital First Primary Care for those with multiple long-term conditions: a rapid review of the views of stakeholders.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39056123 Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization WHO called to return to the Declaration of Alma-Ata. 2024. [2024 Jul 9]. https://www.who.int/teams/social-determinants-of-health/declaration-of-a... . [Internet]. [cited . ]. Available from:
-
- Schäfer WLA, Van Den Berg MJ, Groenewegen PP. The association between the workload of general practitioners and patient experiences with care: Results of a cross-sectional study in 33 countries Human Resources for Health 2020 NaN18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00520-9. . . ; ( ): . doi: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources