Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 3;11(1):e40883.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40883. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.

Review of the environmental and health risks of hydraulic fracturing fluids

Affiliations
Review

Review of the environmental and health risks of hydraulic fracturing fluids

Sara Makki et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

The composition of hydraulic fracturing (HF) fluid poses risks to human health and the environment by impacting drinking water sources. Fracturing fluid recovery rate is highly variable, and the fact that a high percentage of the injected HF fluid is not produced back to the surface in some areas raises questions about its fate and possible migration into aquifers. In this paper, the composition of the HF fluid and related toxicity are described, along with insights about the environmental impact linked with HF fluid, synthesized spill data, main factors affecting the flow-back ratio, and induced seismicity related to HF activities. The environmental and health hazards posed by HF fluid are concerning due to the high concentration of toxic chemicals, the limited data on toxicity, the high probability of spills, and the reported cases of aquifer contamination. Furthermore, low load recovery values (10%-50 %) suggest that a significant volume of fracturing fluids may remain in the subsurface, thereby potentially increasing the likelihood of fluid migration towards drinking water sources under certain conditions. Hence, the fate of HF fluid is explained by establishing correlations between fluid flow (i.e., flow-back and migration to the subsurface) and different operation and formation parameters. For example, a negative correlation was detected between HF fluid recovery and shut-in period, fracture network complexity, and induced seismicity, while a positive correlation was observed between HF fluid migration speed and permeable pathways. Moreover, it is shown that the main handicap in assessing related risks is the scarcity of disclosure and monitoring data. Consequently, future work must focus on imposing strict disclosure and incident-reporting regulations, and more publications should be dedicated to inspecting the composition and impact of HF fluid.

Keywords: Environment; Fracturing fluid; Hydraulic fracturing; Recovery; Risk; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Water-based fracturing fluid composition (reproduced from Ref. [58]).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Toxicological data of biocides used in hydraulic fracturing operations [54].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent distribution of material related to hydraulic fracturing that are spilled, their source and cause. These values were calculated using the number of spills per material, source, and cause types relative to the total number of spills with data synthesized from the U.S. EPA [76].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Annual number of reported spills from 2005 to 2014 across four states [75].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Load recovery values and ranges for shales (where accurate data was available, load recovery values were constrained in a range) (data obtained from Refs. [62,[93], [94], [95], [96]]).

Similar articles

References

    1. Khan H.J., Eleanor S., Jew A.D., Bargar J., Kovscek A., Druhan J.L. A critical review of the physicochemical impacts of water chemistry on shale in hydraulic fracturing systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(3):1377–1394. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04901. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy R.P., Fraiser Institute Managing the risks of hydraulic fracturing. 2020. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/rjvz7h
    1. Zou G., Pan B., Zhu W., Liu Y., Ma S., Liu M. Investigation of fracturing fluid flowback in hydraulically fractured formations based on microscopic visualization experiments. Polymers. 2023;15(6) doi: 10.3390/polym15061560. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thurman E.M., Ferrer I., Blotevogel J., Borch T. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced waters using accurate mass: identification of ethoxylated surfactants. Anal. Chem. 2014;86(19):9653–9661. doi: 10.1021/ac502163k. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liao K., Zhang S., Ma X., Zou Y. Numerical investigation of fracture compressibility and uncertainty on water-loss and production performance in tight oil reservoirs. Energies. 2019;12(7) doi: 10.3390/en12071189. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources