Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 31;6(1):100711.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100711. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Brief Report: Precision Language and Deletion of the "S" Word

Ciara Lockstadt  1 , Mary M Pasquinelli  2 , Jill Feldman  3 , Jamie L Studts  4 , Jamie S Ostroff  5 , Li Liu  6 , Ella A Kazerooni  7 , Robert A Smith  8 , Lisa Carter-Bawa  9   10 , Lawrence E Feldman  11   12
Affiliations

Brief Report: Precision Language and Deletion of the "S" Word

Ciara Lockstadt et al. JTO Clin Res Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: In 2021, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) published the IASLC Language Guide as guidance on preferred language and phrasing in oral and written communications, including presentations at conferences. This study analyzed presentations from the 2022 IASLC World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC) one year after implementation of the Language Guide to identify adoption rates of non-stigmatizing language and to determine correlations with presenter characteristics.

Methods: We downloaded 522 slide presentations from the IASLC WCLC 2022 conference attendee portal. We searched each presentation, including images, for discussion of tobacco use and the use of the term "smoker," which is an indicator of stigmatizing language. We conducted internet searches to gather presenters' stated home continent, sex, specialty, and professional degree.

Results: Of 177 presentations that discussed smoking status, 77 presenters used non-stigmatizing language, whereas 100 presenters used the stigmatizing term "smoker." Male MDs and female PhDs and non-medicine subspecialties and advocates were more likely to use non-stigmatizing language.

Conclusions: Encouragingly, only after one year post-release of the Language Guide, more than one-third of the presenters at the WCLC used non-stigmatizing language. This finding represents a step toward improving respectful and inclusive language surrounding smoking within the thoracic oncology community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this publication have received research support from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Colorado Department of Public Health, Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, and the Patient Centered Outcomes Institute. They hold royalties in UpToDate and receive consulting fees from University of Pennsylvania, Washington University, Boston University, the Moffitt Cancer Center, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, External Health Equity Advisory Board for New York State Quitline, and Gilead Sciences Community Oncology Advisory Board. They receive honoraria or payment for ACS ECHO Presentations and support for attending meetings of the ACS National Lung Cancer Roundtable and the Go2 Foundation for Lung Cancer. Furthermore, they serve leadership roles in the Commission on Cancer QI Committee (Just ASK).

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service Smoking and health: Report of the advisory committee to the surgeon general of the Public Health Service. https://www.unav.edu/documents/16089811/16155256/Smoking+and+Health+the+...
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/consequences-smoking-exec-summar...
    1. Hamann H.A., Ver Hoeve E.S., Carter-Harris L., Studts J.L., Ostroff J.S. Multilevel Opportunities to address lung cancer stigma across the cancer control continuum. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:1062–1075. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williamson T.J., Riley K.E., Carter-Harris L., Ostroff J.S. Changing the language of how we measure and report smoking status: implications for reducing stigma, restoring dignity, and improving the precision of scientific communication. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22:2280–2282. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer The Language Guide. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. https://www.iaslc.org/IASLCLanguageGuide

LinkOut - more resources