Analysis of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match Results: 2016 to 2022
- PMID: 39759660
- PMCID: PMC11700526
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75203
Analysis of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match Results: 2016 to 2022
Abstract
Background: Objective data examining match trends and applicant characteristics are in high demand given the stakes involved with the orthopaedic surgery match. Our study sought to analyse the trends among matched orthopaedic surgery applicants to clarify how medical students can best prepare for and assess their chances of a successful orthopaedic residency match. Methods: We used the publicly available National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Interactive Charting Outcomes in the Match tool to gather characteristics for matched and unmatched orthopaedic surgery applicants from 2016 to 2022 and compare the probability of matching for all applicants versus each subgroup of reported applicant characteristics using risk difference (RD) and two-tailed p-values. Results: Step 1 score >250 (p <0.001), being a US MD applicant (p <0.001), ranking ≥11 contiguous programs (p<0.001), Step 2 score >250 (p <0.001), five to 10 research experiences (p <0.001), five to 15 publications (p <0.002), five to 25 volunteer experiences (p<0.03), and Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Honor Medical Society membership (p<0.001) were associated with increased chance of matching while having a non-PhD graduate degree decreased probability of matching (RD -8.3%, p<0.001) and a PhD degree had no associated change in match probability. Conclusions: These results show that applicants who possess higher Step 1 and 2 scores, are AOA members, US MD applicants, and have a rank ≥11 in orthopaedic programs are more likely to successfully match. A continuing significant increase in the probability of matching was noted until more than 25 programs were ranked.
Keywords: match; nrmp; orthopaedic residency match; orthopaedic surgery; orthopaedics.
Copyright © 2024, de Araujo et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Gu A. Gu A. What’s new for medical student orthopaedic applicants. AAOS Now (blog) AAOS Now. 2022. https://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2022/jul/residency/residency02/ https://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2022/jul/residency/residency02/
-
- Academic characteristics of orthopaedic surgery residency applicants from 2007 to 2014. DePasse JM, Palumbo MA, Eberson CP, Daniels AH. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:788–795. - PubMed
-
- Matching in orthopaedic surgery. Chen AF, Secrist ES, Scannell BP, Patt JC. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:135–144. - PubMed
-
- Is orthopedics more competitive today than when my attending matched? An analysis of National Resident Matching Program data for orthopedic PGY1 applicants from 1984 to 2011. Karnes JM, Mayerson JL, Scharschmidt TJ. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:530–542. - PubMed
-
- Resident selection: how we are doing and why? Thordarson DB, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio SN, Schnall SB, Patzakis MJ. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:255–259. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous