Glucarpidase for treatment of high-dose methotrexate toxicity
- PMID: 39760780
- PMCID: PMC12782973
- DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024026211
Glucarpidase for treatment of high-dose methotrexate toxicity
Abstract
High-dose methotrexate (MTX) results in high rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), neutropenia, and hepatotoxicity. Glucarpidase is a recombinant enzyme that cleaves MTX, but clinical data supporting its use are scarce. We examined the association between glucarpidase administration and outcomes in adults with MTX-AKI from 28 cancer centers across the United States using a sequential target trial emulation framework. The primary end point was kidney recovery at hospital discharge, defined as survival to discharge with serum creatinine <1.5-fold baseline and without dialysis dependence. Key secondary end points were time to kidney recovery, neutropenia, and transaminitis on day 7, and time to death. Using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, we compared outcomes in patients who received glucarpidase within 4 days following MTX initiation with those in patients who did not. Among 708 patients with MTX-AKI, 209 (29.5%) received glucarpidase. Overall, 183 (25.8%) had a primary end point event. Glucarpidase receipt was associated with a 2.70-fold higher adjusted odds of kidney recovery (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-4.31) compared with no glucarpidase receipt. Patients treated with glucarpidase also had faster time to kidney recovery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-3.33) and lower risks of grade ≥2 neutropenia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.91) and grade ≥2 transaminitis (aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.91) on day 7. There was no difference in time to death (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49-1.18). These data suggest glucarpidase may improve both renal and extrarenal outcomes in patients with MTX-AKI.
© 2025 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: S.G. was a scientific coordinator for the ASCEND trial (GlaxoSmithKline); served as a consultant for Secretome, Proletariat Therapeutics, and Alexion; and received research support from BTG International, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute’s Wong Foundation, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. D.E.L. received research support from BioPorto, BTG International Ltd, and Metro International Biotech LLC; and served as a consultant for Sidereal Therapeutics, Casma Therapeutics, MexBrain, Entrada Therapeutics, and CardioRenal Systems, Inc. A.V. served as a consultant for Fresenius, NxStage, and Astute; and has received honoraria from Fresenius, Baxter, and Quanta. A.R. has received royalties from Wolters-Kluwer and Elsevier; and research support from Angion Biomedica Corp. J.D. received research support from AstraZeneca and Servier; and is a stockholder of Pfizer, Gilead, and GlaxoSmithKline. A.G. served as a consultant for Kaneka, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Vera, Chinook, ValenzaBio, Alexion Travere, and Calliditas; and received grant support from Amgen, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Travere, Chinook, Vera, and ValenzaBio. D.A.B. served as a consultant for Nurix Therapeutics, SeaGen, Novartis, and Kite/Gilead; and received research funding from Novartis, Nurix Therapeutics, Incyte, GenMab, Kite/Gilead, and Bristol Myers Squibb. M.E.S. received research funding from Angion, Otsuka, Gilead, AbbVie, Cabaletta, Novartis, and EMD Serono; served as a consultant for Resonance; is a Data Safety and Monitoring Board member of Alpine Immunosciences; and served on the scientific advisory boards of Vera, Travere, Calliditas, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis. A.S.L. has served as a consultant for Genmab, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Kite Pharma, and Research to Practice Speaker’s Bureau. A.C.S is a consultant for OnVIv; and has served as a consultant for Vivace Therapeutics. L.N. has received consulting fees from Ono, Brave Bio, Genmab, and Curis; has received support from Ono, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi, Curis, Merck, Astra Zeneca, and Kazia; honorariums from Ono and Astra Zeneca; royalties from Wolters Kluwer/UpToDate Inc; and grant support from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. R.K.L received consulting fees from Alnylam Pharma and Recordati Pharma; and received grant support from Disc Medicine. N.L. received grant funding from Omeros; and is a stockholder of AbbVie and Checkpoint Therapeutics. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
Comment in
-
Methotrexate and glucarpidase: the emperor has new clothes.Blood. 2025 Apr 24;145(17):1829-1830. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024027791. Blood. 2025. PMID: 40272855 No abstract available.
References
-
- Anninga JK, Gelderblom H, Fiocco M, et al. Chemotherapeutic adjuvant treatment for osteosarcoma: where do we stand? Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(16):2431–2445. - PubMed
-
- Mishima K, Nishikawa R, Narita Y, et al. Randomized phase III study of high-dose methotrexate and whole brain radiotherapy with or without concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma: JCOG1114C. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):2500.
-
- Abramson JS, Hellmann M, Barnes JA, et al. Intravenous methotrexate as central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis is associated with a low risk of CNS recurrence in high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer. 2010;116(18):4283–4290. - PubMed
-
- Amitai I, Rozovski U, El-Saleh R, et al. Risk factors for high-dose methotrexate associated acute kidney injury in patients with hematological malignancies. Hematol Oncol. 2020;38(4):584–588. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
