Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul;50(7):3036-3048.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04705-x. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

Imaging and management of complications post biliary-enteric anastomosis

Affiliations
Review

Imaging and management of complications post biliary-enteric anastomosis

Wyanne Law et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Biliary-enteric anastomosis is a common surgical procedure for benign and malignant pathologies involving bile ducts, pancreas and duodenum, as well as during liver transplantation. Imaging is key in detecting potential complications. Ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear scintigraphy provide complementary information. Ultrasound offers real-time assessment of bile duct dilation and fluid collection. CT scan, due to its wide availability, is often performed first and provides detailed cross-sectional anatomy. MRI, including MR cholangiography, excels in visualizing bile ducts and detecting subtle changes in anastomosis integrity. Common complications of BEA include bile leak, biliary anastomotic stricture, and cholangitis, each presenting with distinct imaging features. Effective imaging allows for early detection and management of these complications, improving patient outcomes. This review discusses the role of imaging in assessing post-BEA complications and emphasizes the importance of multimodal imaging approaches in the comprehensive evaluation of BEA and its complications.

Keywords: Benign biliary pathologies; Bile leak; Biliary anastomotic stricture; Biliary system; Biliary-enteric anastomosis; Cholangitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest from all the authors.

References

    1. Seifert L, Von Renesse J, Seifert AM, et al. Interrupted versus continuous suture technique for biliary-enteric anastomosis: randomized clinical trial. BJS Open. 2023;7(1):zrac163. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac163
    1. Schreuder AM, Franken LC, van Dieren S, Besselink MG, Busch OR, van Gulik TM. Choledochoduodenostomy versus hepaticojejunostomy – a matched case–control analysis. HPB. 2021;23(4):560-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okamoto H, Miura K, Itakura J, Fujii H. Current assessment of choledochoduodenostomy: 130 consecutive series. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99(7):545-549. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0082 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Sarmiento JM. Hepaticojejunostomy: Indications and surgical technique. Oper Tech Gen Surg. 2000;2(4):295-303. https://doi.org/10.1053/otgn.2000.20846 - DOI
    1. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101-125. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources