Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;54(8):1621-1630.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04861-7. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

MRI grading using the neuropathy score-reporting and data system with electrodiagnostic correlation in radial neuropathy around the elbow: a 13-year retrospective review

Affiliations

MRI grading using the neuropathy score-reporting and data system with electrodiagnostic correlation in radial neuropathy around the elbow: a 13-year retrospective review

Benjamin Abiri et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the Neuropathy Score-Reporting and Data System (NS-RADS) MRI grading system in conjunction with electrodiagnostic (EDx) testing for radial neuropathy at the elbow.

Materials and methods: Patients presenting between 2010 and 2023 with suspected radial neuropathy who underwent both EDx testing in the form of electromyography and nerve conduction studies and MRI within a 12-month period were evaluated. Three blinded radiologists used the NS-RADS grading system to evaluate nerve entrapment (E grades), muscle denervation (M grades) proximally within the supinator/extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), and more distally within the forearm extensor muscles. These grades and the presence of lateral epicondylitis were then correlated with EDx abnormalities.

Results: Forty-nine participants were included. Inter-reader reliability for M grades in the forearm extensor muscles was good (ICC = 0.90 [95% CI = 0.83 - 0.94], p < 0.001), as was reliability for the supinator/ECRB muscles (ICC = 0.91 [95% CI = 0.86-0.95], p < 0.001). Inter-reader reliability for E grades was moderate (ICC = 0.83 [95% CI = 0.69-0.90], p < 0.001). Patients with positive EDx studies had a significantly different distribution of M grades for the forearm extensors and supinator/ECRB than those with negative studies (all p values < 0.001). However, overall consensus reads showed no significant difference in the distribution of E grades between patients with positive and negative EDx studies.

Conclusion: Muscle grading strongly correlated with EDx positivity, with a high level of inter-reader agreement for muscle denervation-related alterations. Nerve grading, however, did not show a statistical correlation.

Keywords: Electrodiagnostic; MRI; Neuropathy; Radial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human subjects were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the IRB. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Stanley J. Radial tunnel syndrome: a surgeon’s perspective. J Hand Ther. 2006;19(2):180–4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dang AC, Rodner CM. Unusual compression neuropathies of the forearm, part I: radial nerve. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(10):1906–14. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Węgiel A, Karauda P, Zielinska N, Tubbs RS, Olewnik Ł. Radial nerve compression: anatomical perspective and clinical consequences. Neurosurg Rev. 2023;46(1):53. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Clavert P, Lutz JC, Adam P, Wolfram-Gabel R, Liverneaux P, Kahn JL. Frohse’s arcade is not the exclusive compression site of the radial nerve in its tunnel. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(2):114–8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chien AJ, Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA, Hayes CW, Louis DS. Sonography and MR imaging of posterior interosseous nerve syndrome with surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(1):219–21. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources