Influence of Obesity, Race and Gender on Radiation Exposure for Epidural Procedures
- PMID: 39760932
- DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01327-2
Influence of Obesity, Race and Gender on Radiation Exposure for Epidural Procedures
Abstract
Purpose of review: This retrospective, case controlled, comparative evaluation review of radiation exposure during epidural procedures in interventional pain management assessed variations in radiation exposure based on obesity, race, and gender.
Recent findings: Numerous publications have shown increasing radiation exposure based on body mass index (BMI). However, the influence of race and gender have not been studied. A recent study assessing radiation exposure for epidural procedures with mandated 2 views, compared to a single view or optional 2 views, showed an increase in exposure time of 21%, with radiation dose increases of 133%. The influence of obesity, has been studied, but potential influence of race, and gender on radiation exposure for epidural procedures has not been studied. The present review shows a prevalence of total obesity with BMI of 30 or above of 50.9%, with a higher prevalence in patients below the age of 45, female gender, and African Americans. Mean fluoroscopy time and dose increased significantly from 6.9 s to 0.925 milligray (mGy) for all epidural procedures for those who are underweight to 10.0 s and 6.7 mGy for those with Class 3 obesity above BMI of 40. However, after adjusting for body mass index, no significant differences were noted in race for both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose across multiple epidural procedures. Fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased in males in cervical interlaminar and lumbar transforaminal procedures.
Keywords: Gender; Obesity; Race; Radiation dose; Radiation exposure time; Spinal interventional procedures.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Alan D. Kaye served as an editor for Current Pain and Headache Reports. Dr. Hirsch is a consultant for Medtronic, Relievant, and Sanofi. He is a grant supported Senior Affiliate Research Fellow at the Neiman Policy Institute. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Radiation Exposure with Mandatory Two Fluoroscopic Views for Epidural Procedures.Pain Physician. 2023 Nov;26(7):557-567. Pain Physician. 2023. PMID: 37976484
-
Radiation Doses for Different Approaches of Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Injections: An Observational Clinical Study.Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E67-E72. Pain Physician. 2022. PMID: 35051153
-
Examining the association of body mass index and the depth of epidural space, radiation dose exposure and fluoroscopic screening time during transforaminal nerve block injection: a retrospective cohort study.Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;188(1):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1845-7. Epub 2018 Jun 17. Ir J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 29911292
-
Intraoperative radiation exposure in hip arthroscopy: a systematic review.Hip Int. 2020 May;30(3):267-275. doi: 10.1177/1120700019887362. Epub 2019 Nov 25. Hip Int. 2020. PMID: 31766894
-
Epidural Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines.Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(S1):S27-S208. Pain Physician. 2021. PMID: 33492918 Review.
References
-
- Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, et al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996–2013. JAMA. 2016;316:2627–46. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16885 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Dieleman JL, Cao J, Chapin A, et al. US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996–2016. JAMA. 2020;323:863–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0734 . This article is important as it identifies that U.S. health care spending rose from $1.4 trillion in 1996 to $3.1 trillion in 2016. Public insurance experienced the highest annual growth rate, and spending patterns varied by conditions, payers, and types of care. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Vangala BP, et al. Spinal cord stimulation trends of utilization and expenditures in fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare population from 2009 to 2018. Pain Physician. 2021;24:293–308 PMID: 34323431. - PubMed
-
- Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Sanapati MR et al. COVID-19 pandemic reduced utilization of interventional techniques 18.7% in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population in 2020: Analysis of utilization data from 2000 to 2020. Pain Physician. 2022; 25:223 – 38. PMID: 35652763. * This article is important as it identifies that utilization of interventional techniques for chronic pain management among the U.S. Medicare population declined by 18.7% from 2019 to 2020, partly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, from 2010 to 2020, there was a 22.0% decrease in utilization, despite annual population growth, indicating significant shifts in pain management practices.
-
- Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Latchaw RE, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilization patterns of facet joint interventions in managing spinal pain in Medicare population. Pain Ther. 2023;12:505–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00476-3 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials