Instructional design features in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia simulation-based training: a systematic review
- PMID: 39762010
- PMCID: PMC11987786
- DOI: 10.1111/anae.16527
Instructional design features in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia simulation-based training: a systematic review
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia enhances pain control, patient outcomes and lowers healthcare costs. However, teaching this skill effectively presents challenges with current training methods. Simulation-based medical education offers advantages over traditional methods. However, the use of instructional design features in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia simulation training has not been defined. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the prevalence of various instructional design features in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia simulation training and their correlation with learning outcomes using a modified Kirkpatrick model.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted including studies from inception to August 2024. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials; controlled before-and-after studies; and other experimental designs focusing on ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia simulation training. Data extraction included study characteristics; simulation modalities; instructional design features; and outcomes.
Results: Of the 2023 articles identified, 62 met inclusion criteria. Common simulation modalities included live-model scanning and gel phantom models. Instructional design features such as the presence of expert instructors, repetitive practice and multiple learning strategies were prevalent, showing significant improvements across multiple outcome levels. However, fewer studies assessed behaviour (Kirkpatrick level 3) and patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4).
Discussion: Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia simulation training incorporating specific instructional design features enhances educational outcome; this was particularly evident at lower Kirkpatrick levels. Optimal combinations of instructional design features for higher-level outcomes (Kirkpatrick levels 3 and 4) remain unclear. Future research should standardise outcome measurements and isolate individual instructional design features to better understand their impact on clinical practice and patient safety.
Keywords: instructional design features; simulation; systematic review; ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia.
© 2025 The Author(s). Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Educational outcomes of simulation-based training in regional anaesthesia: a scoping review.Br J Anaesth. 2025 Feb;134(2):523-534. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.037. Epub 2024 Oct 2. Br J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 39358185
-
Simulation-based ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia education: a national survey of Canadian anesthesiology residency training programs.Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jan;72(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02818-x. Epub 2024 Aug 6. Can J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 39107539 English.
-
Simulation-based ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia curriculum for anesthesiology residents.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb;72(1):13-23. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00317. Epub 2018 Nov 27. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019. PMID: 30481945 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Simulation-based training in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia for emergency physicians: insights from an Italian pre/post intervention study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1510. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06500-0. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39707369 Free PMC article.
-
Education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia and pain medicine.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;33(5):674-684. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000908. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32826622 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous