Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 7;17(1):4.
doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00333-9.

Expert consensus on pulpotomy in the management of mature permanent teeth with pulpitis

Affiliations
Review

Expert consensus on pulpotomy in the management of mature permanent teeth with pulpitis

Lu Zhang et al. Int J Oral Sci. .

Abstract

Pulpotomy, which belongs to vital pulp therapy, has become a strategy for managing pulpitis in recent decades. This minimally invasive treatment reflects the recognition of preserving healthy dental pulp and optimizing long-term patient-centered outcomes. Pulpotomy is categorized into partial pulpotomy (PP), the removal of a partial segment of the coronal pulp tissue, and full pulpotomy (FP), the removal of whole coronal pulp, which is followed by applying the biomaterials onto the remaining pulp tissue and ultimately restoring the tooth. Procedural decisions for the amount of pulp tissue removal or retention depend on the diagnostic of pulp vitality, the overall treatment plan, the patient's general health status, and pulp inflammation reassessment during operation. This statement represents the consensus of an expert committee convened by the Society of Cariology and Endodontics, Chinese Stomatological Association. It addresses the current evidence to support the application of pulpotomy as a potential alternative to root canal treatment (RCT) on mature permanent teeth with pulpitis from a biological basis, the development of capping biomaterial, and the diagnostic considerations to evidence-based medicine. This expert statement intends to provide a clinical protocol of pulpotomy, which facilitates practitioners in choosing the optimal procedure and increasing their confidence in this rapidly evolving field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pulpotomy divides into PP (a) and FP (b)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Biological mechanism for dental pulp complex against inflammation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Clinical procedure of pulpotomy

References

    1. Barani, M., Aliu, X., Ajeti, N. & Asllani, L. Assessment of correlation between clinical, radiographic, microbiological, and histopathological examinations in identification of pulpal diseases—a single-centre study. Saudi. Dent. J.35, 540–546 (2023). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashem, D. et al. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the efficacy of calcium silicate indirect pulp capping: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Dent. Res.94, 562–568 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ge, L. & Ling, J. Prevalence of pulpal disease and risk indicators analysis in Guangzhou. Chin. J. Stomatol. Res.3, 71–77 (2009).
    1. Yue, L. & Wang, J. Evaluation of therapeutic concept and methods for infected pulp. Zhonghua. Kou. Qiang. Yi. Xue. Za. Zhi.37, 324–326 (2002). - PubMed
    1. Hargreaves, K. M. & Cohen, S. (eds.) Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp 10th edn (2010).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources