Cuttlefish favour their current need to hide rather than their future need for food
- PMID: 39762689
- DOI: 10.3758/s13420-024-00663-y
Cuttlefish favour their current need to hide rather than their future need for food
Abstract
Episodic memory and future thinking are generally considered as two parts of the same mental time travelling system in vertebrates. Modern cephalopods, with their independent evolutionary lineage and their complex cognitive abilities, appear as promising species to determine whether these abilities have separate evolutionary histories or not. In our study, we tested future-planning abilities in a cephalopod species which has been shown to possess episodic-like memory abilities: the common cuttlefish. They were tested on their ability to plan for a future need for food instead of following their current need to hide. To explore the flexibility in such future-planning behaviour, we varied the protective value of the shelter. No future-planning behaviour was observed in cuttlefish during our experiment regardless of the value of the shelter provided. From one perspective, as cuttlefish were facing a trade-off decision, the attractiveness of the shelter (to satisfy their current need) might have been of higher value than their future need to eat (low drive for food). By contrast, our results might reflect an inability of cuttlefish to act in the present to secure future needs, suggesting that episodic memory and future planning might be distinct cognitive traits with their own evolutionary histories. Identifying both similarities and differences in complex cognition between vertebrate species and cephalopods is important to pinpoint which evolutionary pressures have led to the emergence of complex cognitive abilities.
Keywords: Cephalopods; Cuttlefish; Future planning; Mental time travel; Trade-off.
© 2025. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval: All experiments were conducted following the directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and the French regulation for the protection and use of animals in research. Procedures were approved (#22429 2019101417389263 v2) by the regional ethical committee of Normandy region (Comité d’Ethique de Normandie en Matière d’EXpérimentation Animale, CENOMEXA; agreement number 54). Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: All co-authors consent to publication. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Atance, C. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 533–539. - DOI
-
- Billard, P., Clayton, N. S., & Jozet-Alves, C. (2020a). Cuttlefish retrieve whether they smelt or saw a previously encountered item. Scientific Reports, 10, 1–7. - DOI
-
- Billard, P., Schnell, A. K., Clayton, N. S., & Jozet-Alves, C. (2020). Cuttlefish show flexible and future-dependent foraging cognition. Biology Letters, 16, Article 20190743. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0743
-
- Boeckle, M., Schiestl, M., Frohnwieser, A., Gruber, R., Miller, R., Suddendorf, T., . . . Clayton, N. S. (2020). New Caledonian crows plan for specific future tool use. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1938). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1490
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
