Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Dec;44(6):400-411.
doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2973.

Factors influencing audiologic outcomes in ossiculoplasty for chronic otitis media: a prospective multicentre study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Factors influencing audiologic outcomes in ossiculoplasty for chronic otitis media: a prospective multicentre study

Gianluca Fadda et al. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic otitis media (COM) is a prevalent condition affecting auditory function. Ossiculoplasty is a known treatment strategy, but its effectiveness concerning the presence of cholesteatoma has not been extensively studied.

Methods: We conducted a multicentre study involving 153 patients diagnosed with COM without cholesteatoma (ncCOM) and with cholesteatoma (cCOM). Patients underwent ossiculoplasty, and postoperative hearing outcomes were analysed.

Results: After patient selection, 133 participants were included. Postoperatively, significant improvements in hearing function were observed in both groups, substantiating the role of ossiculoplasty in treatment of COM. However, different outcomes were noted between ncCOM and cCOM. Patients with cCOM demonstrated a slightly lesser degree of hearing improvement post-surgery compared to their ncCOM counterparts.

Conclusions: Our findings confirm ossiculoplasty as a standard and effective treatment strategy for COM. The presence of cholesteatoma may influence the effectiveness of surgery, underscoring the need for individualised surgical planning. Future research should focus on confirming these results and more comprehensively exploring the impact of cholesteatoma on surgical outcomes.

Keywords: cholesteatoma; chronic otitis media; ear surgery; hearing outcomes; ossiculoplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Cover figure.
Cover figure.
Comprehensive analysis of surgical interventions and hearing outcomes in chronic otitis media (COM). Our graphical cover illustrates the impact of various surgical approaches on hearing outcomes in patients with different tympanic membrane conditions, comparing COM with and without cholesteatoma while analysing preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) outcomes for non-cholesteatomatous (ncCOM) and cholesteatomatous (cCOM) cases. Our findings highlight significant differences in hearing improvement between these groups and describe the effectiveness of partial ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (PORP) and total ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (TORP) to address hearing loss across distinct middle ear pathologies, providing a comprehensive view of subgroup analysis.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow-diagram of the study protocol.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative outcomes for partial ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (PORP) versus total ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (TORP). The results demonstrate the effectiveness of both surgical approaches in addressing hearing loss in patients with distinct middle ear pathologies.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Analysis of preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) outcomes for patients with non-cholesteatomatous (ncCOM) and cholesteatomatous chronic otitis media (cCOM). The data highlight significant differences in hearing improvement between the two groups.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison of chronic otitis media (COM) with and without cholesteatoma. This figure illustrates the impact of surgical interventions of CWD vs CWU on hearing outcomes in patients with different tympanic membrane conditions.

References

    1. Javia LR, Ruckenstein MJ. Ossiculoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006;39:1177-1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2006.08.010 10.1016/j.otc.2006.08.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsetsos N, Vlachtsis K, Stavrakas M, et al. . Endoscopic versus microscopic ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;278:917-923. https://doi.org/ - PubMed
    1. Coleman H, Tikka T, Curran J, et al. . Comparison of endoscopic vs microscopic ossiculoplasty: a study of 157 consecutive cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022;280:89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07451-2 10.1007/s00405-022-07451-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iannella G, De Vincentiis M, Greco A, et al. . Endoscopic approach in second stage ossicular chain reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol 2019;40:735-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.07.004. 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.07.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milazzo M, Danti S, Inglese F, et al. . Ossicular replacement prostheses from banked bone with ergonomic and functional geometry. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2017;105:2495-2506. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33790 10.1002/jbm.b.33790 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources