This is a preprint.
Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra testing in childhood tuberculosis: A prospective, multi-country accuracy study
- PMID: 39763536
- PMCID: PMC11702738
- DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.17.24317956
Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra testing in childhood tuberculosis: A prospective, multi-country accuracy study
Update in
-
Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra testing in childhood tuberculosis: A prospective, multi-country accuracy study.Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 3:ciaf289. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf289. Online ahead of print. Clin Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40460214
Abstract
Background: Centrifuge-free processing methods support stool Xpert Ultra testing for childhood tuberculosis (TB), but there are limited data on their accuracy, acceptability and usability.
Methods: We conducted a prospective evaluation of stool Xpert Ultra in India, South Africa, and Uganda with three methods: Stool Processing Kit (SPK), Simple One-Step (SOS), and Optimized Sucrose Flotation (OSF). Children <15 years old with presumptive TB had respiratory specimen testing with Xpert Ultra and culture. Stool was tested using Xpert Ultra after processing with each method. We compared the accuracy of each method to a microbiological reference standard (MRS) and a composite reference standard (CRS). We surveyed the laboratory staff to assess acceptability and usability of the methods.
Results: We included 607 children, of whom the median age was 3.5 years (IQR 1.3-7), 48% were female, and 15.5% were HIV positive. Against the MRS, the sensitivities of SPK, SOS and OSF were 36.9% (95% CI 28.6-45.8), 38.6% (95% CI 17.2-51), and 31.3% (95% CI 20.2-44.1), respectively. The specificities of SPK, SOS and OSF were 98.2% (95% CI 96.4-99.3), 97.3% (95% CI 93.7-99.1) and 97.1% (95% CI 93.3-99), respectively. Laboratory staff reported that the methods were acceptable and usable, but SOS was most feasible to implement in a peripheral facility. Sensitivity increased among children who were culture-positive (55-77.3%) and was low (13-16.7%) against the CRS.
Conclusions: Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra were acceptable, usable, and performed similarly, with highest sensitivity among children with culture-positive TB.
Keywords: Xpert Ultra; centrifuge-free; child; diagnostics; stool; tuberculosis.
Conflict of interest statement
For potential conflicts of interest, MPN, DA, PB and FIND were involved in the development of SPK, PD and ET for SOS, and MB and ML for OSF. DA holds patents related to tuberculosis detection and drug treatment, and receives royalty payments for one or more of these patents that have been licensed by Rutgers University to Cepheid. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 3: diagnosis – rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection, third edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2024.
-
- Agarwal A, Mathur SB. Stool CBNAAT: Alternative tool in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis 2023. - PubMed
-
- Walters E, Gie RP, Hesseling AC, Friedrich SO, Diacon AH, Gie RP. Rapid diagnosis of pediatric intrathoracic tuberculosis from stool samples using the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay: a pilot study. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2012; 31(12): 1316. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources