Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Dec 21:2024.12.20.629715.
doi: 10.1101/2024.12.20.629715.

Asymmetries in foveal vision

Affiliations

Asymmetries in foveal vision

Samantha K Jenks et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

  • Asymmetries in Foveal Vision.
    Jenks SK, Carrasco M, Poletti M. Jenks SK, et al. J Neurosci. 2025 Sep 3;45(36):e0055252025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0055-25.2025. J Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40695598 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Visual perception is characterized by known asymmetries in the visual field; human's visual sensitivity is higher along the horizontal than the vertical meridian, and along the lower than the upper vertical meridian. These asymmetries decrease with decreasing eccentricity from the periphery to the center of gaze, suggesting that they may be absent in the 1-deg foveola, the retinal region used to explore scenes at high-resolution. Using high-precision eyetracking and gaze-contingent display, allowing for accurate control over the stimulated foveolar location despite the continuous eye motion at fixation, we investigated fine visual discrimination at different isoeccentric locations across the foveola and parafovea. Although the tested foveolar locations were only 0.3 deg away from the center of gaze, we show that, similar to more eccentric locations, humans are more sensitive to stimuli presented along the horizontal than the vertical meridian. Whereas the magnitude of this asymmetry is reduced in the foveola, the magnitude of the vertical meridian asymmetry is comparable but, interestingly, reversed: objects presented slightly above the center of gaze are more easily discerned than when presented at the same eccentricity below the center of gaze. Therefore, far from being uniform, as often assumed, foveolar vision is characterized by perceptual asymmetries. Further, these asymmetries differ not only in magnitude but also in direction compared to those present just ~4deg away from the center of gaze, resulting in overall different foveal and extrafoveal perceptual fields.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Experimental protocol.
A- Subjects fixated monocularly (left eye patched) on a central fixation marker while stimuli were presented. The target, a small bar tilted ± 45 deg, appeared briefly (50ms) at one of 4 possible locations and subjects were asked to report its orientation once the response cue was presented. A total of eight locations were tested. Cardinal and intercardinal locations were tested in separate blocks. B- Stimuli spatial arrangement and dimensions in the foveola (left; n = 12) and parafovea (right; n = 8) conditions. In the latter condition, stimuli were magnified according to the cortical magnification factor. C- In a preliminary session, the stimulus contrast was determined for the foveola and the parafovea conditions separately, so that overall performance across cardinal and intercardinal locations yielded ≈70% correct responses. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals. D- The target was 20 arcmin from the center of the display. The box and whisker plot shows that the average gaze distance from the target was approximately 20 arcminutes for different target locations in the foveola condition.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Horizontal-Vertical Meridian Asymmetry.
A and B- Average performance along the horizontal (pooled left and right locations) and vertical meridian (pooled top and bottom locations) across subjects for the foveola and the parafovea. Lines in A and colored dots in B represent individual observers. In A, asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (*P<0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, paired t-test p = 0.02 foveola, p = 0.0004 parafovea). C- Magnitude and direction of the horizontal-vertical meridian asymmetry. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from zero (one sample t-test p = 0.02 foveola, p = 0.0004 parafovea). D- Average performance along the horizontal meridian compared to the upper and lower vertical meridian performance for the foveola and the parafovea. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0001 foveola, p < 0.0001 parafovea). All Error bars are 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Vertical Meridian Asymmetry.
Conventions are the same as in Fig. 2. A and B- Average performance along the upper and lower vertical meridian across subjects. In A, asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (paired t-test, p = 0.001 foveola, p = 0.002 parafovea). C- Magnitude and direction of the vertical meridian asymmetry. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from zero (one sample t-test, p = 0.001 foveola, p = 0.002 parafovea). All error bars are 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Performance fields in the foveola and parafovea. A- The visual performance field in the foveola (purple) and parafovea (green). Each angle represents one tested location. Numbers along the radial direction represent percent correct, and the shaded regions represent SEM. The lines connect the average performance across subjects for the different locations tested. B- Magnitude and direction of the asymmetry between the upper intercardinal locations (locations at 45 and 135 deg) and the lower intercardinal locations (locations at 225 and 315 deg). Filled circles represent individual observers. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Randall Harry G, Brown Darlene J, and Sloan Louise L. Peripheral visual acuity. Archives of Ophthalmology, 75(4):500–504, 1966. - PubMed
    1. Westheimer Gerald. Scaling of visual acuity measurements. Archives of Ophthalmology, 97(2):327–330, 1979. - PubMed
    1. Millodot Michel, Johnson Chris A, Lamont Anne, and Leibowitz Herschel W. Effect of dioptrics on peripheral visual acuity. Vision Research, 15(12):1357–1362, 1975. - PubMed
    1. Rijsdijk JP, Kroon JN, and Van der Wildt GJ. Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina. Vision research, 20(3):235–241, 1980. - PubMed
    1. Wright MJ and Johnston A. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus. Vision Research, 23 (10):983–989, 1983. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources