Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 13;12(24):2530.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242530.

Patient Experience in Older Adults with Diabetes: A Narrative Review on Interventions to Improve Patient Experience and Research Gaps

Affiliations
Review

Patient Experience in Older Adults with Diabetes: A Narrative Review on Interventions to Improve Patient Experience and Research Gaps

Hidetaka Hamasaki. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Patient experience is a critical healthcare quality indicator, evolving from Patient Satisfaction (PS) and encompassing patients' concrete healthcare experiences. It is increasingly vital in aging societies where collaborative efforts among patients, families, and healthcare professionals are essential. Studies suggest that enhanced patient experience leads to better adherence, outcomes, and patient safety. This paper reviews patient experience evaluations in older adults with diabetes through randomized controlled trial (RCT)-based findings. The author searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, and CINAHL. The review focused on RCTs examining interventions affecting patient experience and PS in T2D/T1D patients aged ≥65. A total of 13 RCTs were eligible for this review. This review highlights studies on diabetes management in older adults, assessing the impact of health education, diabetes management programs, treatments, mHealth, and advanced insulin delivery systems. Early studies showed that education improved self-care but had a limited impact on glycemic control. Key findings include the effectiveness of experience-based education in improving HbA1c, the benefits of insulin therapy for elderly patients, and the value of structured peer-to-peer diabetes management programs in enhancing satisfaction. Patient adherence, satisfaction, and personalized support emerged as critical factors influencing diabetes management across various interventions. More recent trials involving mHealth demonstrated improvements in glycemic control and PS through automated data sharing and app-based support. Closed-loop insulin delivery studies reported reduced mental strain, improved glycemic control, and better quality of life, despite barriers such as device cost and occasional system limitations. These interventions highlight the potential of advanced technologies to enhance diabetes care, particularly for aging populations. Previous RCTs show that education, structured management programs, effective insulin therapies, and advanced digital treatments improve patient experience, though well-designed studies focusing on patient experience as a primary outcome are lacking. Developing patient experience assessment scales for aging diabetes patients and adapting healthcare systems to maximize patient experience amid digitalization trends are essential, warranting further research.

Keywords: digital health; patient experience; patient satisfaction; randomized controlled trial; type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient experience is a holistic concept encompassing patients, healthcare professionals, caregivers, as well as families, healthcare institutions, and care facilities. It is shaped by interactions with patients and can be regarded as a community issue that is crucial for enhancing healthcare quality in an aging society. Moreover, recent advancements in IoT technology have made real-time connections between patients and healthcare providers or facilities possible. With the progress of digital healthcare, patient experience is expected to evolve further.

Similar articles

References

    1. Oben P. Understanding the Patient Experience: A Conceptual Framework. J. Patient Exp. 2020;7:906–910. doi: 10.1177/2374373520951672. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anhang P.R., Elliott M.N., Zaslavsky A.M., Hays R.D., Lehrman W.G., Rybowski L., Edgman-Levitan S., Cleary P.D. Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2014;71:522–554. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541480. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gleeson H., Calderon A., Swami V., Deighton J., Wolpert M., Edbrooke-Childs J. Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011907. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beattie M., Murphy D.J., Atherton I., Lauder W. Instruments to measure patient experience of healthcare quality in hospitals: A systematic review. Syst. Rev. 2015;4:97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0089-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jesus T.S., Struhar J., Zhang M., Lee D., Stern B.Z., Heinemann A.W., Jordan N., Deutsch A. Near real-time patient experience feedback with data relay to providers: A systematic review of its effectiveness. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2024;36:mzae053. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae053. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources