Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 19;16(24):4232.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16244232.

Evaluation of Emotional Distress in Oncology Palliative Patients: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Palliative Outcome Scale (POS)-A Portuguese Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Evaluation of Emotional Distress in Oncology Palliative Patients: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Palliative Outcome Scale (POS)-A Portuguese Cross-Sectional Study

Florbela Gonçalves et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer patients in palliative care frequently experience psychological distress, encompassing cognitive, behavioral, and emotional dimensions. This distress can significantly affect their capacity to accept the inevitability of death. Commonly, such distress manifests as sadness, depression, anxiety, and fear, which may culminate in an existential crisis.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) among hospitalized cancer patients receiving palliative care in a Portuguese palliative care unit.

Methods: Data were collected from psychological screening instruments (ESAS and POS) used in oncology patients admitted to an oncology palliative service. The study period spanned from January 2021 to March 2021.

Results: The study included a convenience sample of 60 patients diagnosed with advanced cancer who were sequentially admitted to a palliative care unit. The most frequently reported primary oncological diagnoses were gastrointestinal (41.7%) and head/neck (20%) tumors. The majority of the patients were male (n = 37; 61.7%), with a median age of 72 years (range: 43-94 years). Key findings from the analysis indicated the following associations: anxiety and self-reported symptoms (higher levels of patient anxiety related to illness or treatment were strongly correlated with increased self-reported anxiety (p < 0.01)); emotional sharing and perceived meaning of life (patients who shared their feelings less frequently with family and friends were significantly less likely to find meaning in life (p < 0.01) and were more likely to report a poorer self-perception (p < 0.05)); understanding the importance of life and self-perception (a diminished understanding of the importance of life was associated with worsened self-perception (p < 0.01)); anxiety and depressive symptoms (greater anxiety related to the disease or its treatment correlated with an increased severity of depressive symptoms (p < 0.01)).

Discussion and conclusion: There are numerous validated instruments available for measuring emotional distress. Among these, the ESAS and POS complement each other as practical and easy-to-use tools for evaluating emotional distress in patients admitted to palliative care settings. Findings revealed that anxiety and concerns related to the disease and its treatment, as measured by the POS, served as predictors of the risk for self-reported anxiety and depression identified by the ESAS. Furthermore, the items within the POS that evaluate the emotional component demonstrated strong internal correlation, supporting their combined use for a comprehensive assessment of this dimension.

Keywords: anxiety; cancer; depression; emotional exhaustion; palliative care; palliative medicine; psychological distress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cutillo A., O’hea E., Person S.D., Lessard D., Harralson T.L., Boudreaux E. The Distress Thermometer: Cutoff Points and Clinical Use. Oncol. Nurs. Forum. 2017;44:329–336. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.329-336. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E., Deal A.M., Kris M.G., Scher H.I., Hudis C.A., Sabbatini P., Rogak L., Bennett A.V., Dueck A.C., Atkinson T.M., et al. Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:557–565. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huertas L.A., Pérez S.R.A., Nieves A.P. Assessment of emotional distress in palliative care: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) vs Distress Thermometer. Palliat. Support. Care. 2023;22:258–264. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523001530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thekkumpurath P., Venkateswaran C., Kumar M., Bennett M.I. Screening for Psychological Distress in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2008;36:520–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.11.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization “Palliative Care”. 2020. [(accessed on 20 May 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care.

LinkOut - more resources