Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 21;16(24):4262.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16244262.

Relative Survival, Conditional Survival, and Causes of Death in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer, with a Focus on Differences Between Cardia and Non-Cardia Cancer

Affiliations

Relative Survival, Conditional Survival, and Causes of Death in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer, with a Focus on Differences Between Cardia and Non-Cardia Cancer

Anas Elgenidy et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Many researchers believe that cardia (CGC) and non-cardia (NCGC) are two different types of tumors, having different features like incidence rate, risk factors, geographical location, and socioeconomic status. This study aims to investigate the causes of death (COD) survival rates among early gastric cancer patients with a focus on differences between CGC and NCGC. Methods: This retrospective study employed SEER*stat software (version 8.3.92) to analyze the SEER 17 plus dataset (2000-2019). Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were computed. Relative survival and conditional survival post-diagnosis were calculated using R software (version 4.1.0) among the different subgroups. Results: Within the follow-up period, 55.4% (5381) died, predominantly within the initial year post-diagnosis. Esophageal cancer was the leading non-gastric cancer cause in CGC, while miscellaneous tumors dominated in NCGC. The 1-year and 5-year relative survival for CGC patients were 76.4% and 48.9% respectively, while for NCGC were 80.4% and 63.9%. The 3-year conditional survival after 1 year and 5e years of survival for CGC were 68.7% and 88.8%, respectively, while for NCGC were 82.2% and 93.5%, respectively. This means that the longer a person has survived after diagnosis with cancer, the greater the likelihood that person will survive for another 3 years. Conclusions: This study sheds light on the substantial impact of non-cancer COD in GC patients, underscoring the necessity of considering comorbidities in their comprehensive management and follow-up. Impact: This study contributes valuable insights for clinical decision-making and informs future research directions regarding CGC and NCGC.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; SEER; causes of death; epidemiology; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in preparing this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of Study Design and Data Processing. This flowchart outlines the research process for this study using data from the SEER database. It includes steps for study design validation, data sourcing, initial dataset extraction, ICD code confirmation for adenocarcinoma cases, classification of adenocarcinoma types, focus on early-stage GC, application of exclusion criteria, and the final cohort selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of Deaths in GC and NCGC Patients by Cause (A) and Time Interval from Diagnosis (B). The figure illustrates the percentage distribution of deaths in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC) and non-cancerous gastric conditions (NCGC). Data are shown by the time interval from diagnosis: within 1 year, 1–2 years, 2–5 years, and beyond 5 years.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lv L., Liang X., Wu D., Wang F., Zhang Y., Cang H., Deng X., Li M. Is cardia cancer a special type of gastric cancer? A differential analysis of early cardia cancer and non-cardia cancer. J. Cancer. 2021;12:2385–2394. doi: 10.7150/jca.51433. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang X., Liu F., Li Y., Tang S., Zhang Y., Chen Y., Khan S.A. Comparison on Clinicopathological Features, Treatments and Prognosis between Proximal Gastric Cancer and Distal Gastric Cancer: A National Cancer Data Base Analysis. J. Cancer. 2019;10:3145–3153. doi: 10.7150/jca.30371. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu X., Hu F., Li C., Yao Q., Zhang H., Xue Y. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2018;11:1037–1044. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S157378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Isik A., Okan I., Firat D., Yilmaz B., Akcakaya A., Sahin M. A new prognostic strategy for gastric carcinoma: Albumin level and metastatic lymph node ratio. Minerva Chir. 2014;69:147–153. - PubMed
    1. Ilic M., Ilic I. Epidemiology of stomach cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022;28:1187–1203. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i12.1187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources