Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal PCR Testing Protocol
- PMID: 39766585
- PMCID: PMC11672858
- DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13121195
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal PCR Testing Protocol
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can cause cases of community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and nasal colonization with this pathogen increases the risk of infection. Due to its high negative predictive value, multiple studies support using the MRSA nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to discontinue antimicrobials that target MRSA in the setting of a negative test result. The purpose of this project was to assess the utility of a protocol to allow pharmacists the ability to order MRSA nasal PCR screenings in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. Results: The pre-protocol group included a random sample of 100 patients, and the post-protocol group included 625 patients. Vancomycin DOTs when pharmacists ordered PCRs were significantly lower compared to the pre-protocol group (p < 0.5; 95% CI, 0.46-2.24). The average length of stay and readmission rates at 30 days were significantly lower in the post-protocol group compared to the pre-protocol group (p < 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively), but there was no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.33). Methods: A protocol was implemented at our institution that allowed pharmacists to order an MRSA nasal PCR test in patients with pneumonia. This retrospective chart review compared a cohort of patients who received vancomycin from before implementation of the protocol to patients who received vancomycin after the protocol's implementation. The primary endpoint was vancomycin days of therapy (DOTs) between the pre-protocol group and the post-protocol group. Other endpoints assessed included the length of hospitalization, readmission rates, and mortality. Conclusions: Pharmacists ordering MRSA nasal PCR tests significantly reduced vancomycin DOTs, average length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates, contributing to positive outcomes in patients with pneumonia.
Keywords: antimicrobial stewardship; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; pneumonia; polymerase chain reaction; vancomycin.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of a Pharmacist-driven Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Nasal Swab Protocol on the De-escalation of Empiric Vancomycin in Patients with Pneumonia in a Rural Healthcare Setting.Cureus. 2019 Dec 13;11(12):e6378. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6378. Cureus. 2019. PMID: 31938656 Free PMC article.
-
Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR Testing Reduces the Duration of MRSA-Targeted Therapy in Patients with Suspected MRSA Pneumonia.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Mar 24;61(4):e02432-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02432-16. Print 2017 Apr. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017. PMID: 28137813 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacist-Driven Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing for Pneumonia.Ann Pharmacother. 2023 May;57(5):560-569. doi: 10.1177/10600280221121144. Epub 2022 Aug 29. Ann Pharmacother. 2023. PMID: 36039495
-
Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening for Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Review of Current Literature.Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Dec;38(12):1216-1228. doi: 10.1002/phar.2188. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Pharmacotherapy. 2018. PMID: 30300441 Review.
-
Systematic Review of the Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening for MRSA Pneumonia.Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;53(6):627-638. doi: 10.1177/1060028018823027. Epub 2019 Jan 2. Ann Pharmacother. 2019. PMID: 30600697
References
-
- Keene A., Vavagiakis P., Lee M.H., Finnerty K., Nicolls D., Cespedes C., Quagliarello B., Chiasson M.A., Chong D., Lowy F.D. Staphylococcus aureus colonization and the risk of infection in critically ill patients. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2005;26:622–628. doi: 10.1086/502591. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ridgway J.P., Peterson L.R., Brown E.C., Du H., Hebert C., Thomson R.B., Jr., Kaul K.L., Robicsek A. Clinical significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization on hospital admission: One-year infection risk. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e79716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079716. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources