Immune-Related Gene Expression Responses to In Ovo Stimulation and LPS Challenge in Two Distinct Chicken Genotypes
- PMID: 39766852
- PMCID: PMC11675432
- DOI: 10.3390/genes15121585
Immune-Related Gene Expression Responses to In Ovo Stimulation and LPS Challenge in Two Distinct Chicken Genotypes
Abstract
Background: In ovo stimulation introduces bioactive compounds, such as prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics into incubating eggs to enhance gut health and immune system development in chickens. This study aimed to determine the genetic and environmental effects modulating responses to in ovo stimulation in commercial broilers and Green-legged Partridge-like (GP) native chickens.
Methods: Eggs were stimulated on day 12 of incubation with prebiotics (GOS-galactooligosaccharides), probiotics (Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris), or synbiotics (GOS + L. lactis), with controls being mock-injected. Hatched chicks were reared in group pens and challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on day 42 post-hatching. Cecal tonsils (CT) and spleens were harvested 2 h post-challenge. RT-qPCR was used to analyze the relative gene expression of cytokine genes: IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p40, and IL-17.
Results: The results show that genotype influenced the expression of all immune-related genes, with broiler chickens exhibiting stronger innate inflammatory responses than native chickens. LPS induced both mucosal (CT) and systemic (spleen) immune responses in broilers but only systemic (spleen) responses in native chickens.
Conclusions: In ovo stimulation had less of an impact on cytokine gene expression than LPS challenge. Broilers expressed higher inflammatory immune responses than GP native chickens.
Keywords: broilers; cytokine; gene expression; mucosal immune responses; native chickens; systemic.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Genotype-dependent development of cellular and humoral immunity in the spleen and cecal tonsils of chickens stimulated in ovo with bioactive compounds.Poult Sci. 2020 Sep;99(9):4343-4350. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.048. Epub 2020 Jun 24. Poult Sci. 2020. PMID: 32867978 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Transcriptomic Effects of Prebiotics and Synbiotics Delivered In Ovo in Broiler Chickens.PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0168899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168899. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 28002487 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of synbiotics injected in ovo on regulation of immune-related gene expression in adult chickens.Am J Vet Res. 2014 Nov;75(11):997-1003. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.11.997. Am J Vet Res. 2014. PMID: 25350090
-
Prebiotics and synbiotics - in ovo delivery for improved lifespan condition in chicken.BMC Vet Res. 2018 Dec 17;14(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1738-z. BMC Vet Res. 2018. PMID: 30558599 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Possibilities of early life programming in broiler chickens via intestinal microbiota modulation.Poult Sci. 2019 Feb 1;98(2):695-706. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey416. Poult Sci. 2019. PMID: 30247675 Review.
References
-
- Olah I., Nagy N., Vervelde L. Avian Immunology. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2014. Structure of the Avian Lymphoid System; pp. 11–44.
-
- Smith A.L., Powers C., Beal R.K. Avian Immunology. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2014. The Avian Enteric Immune System in Health and Disease; pp. 227–250.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources