Domestic Use of E-Cargo Bikes and Other E-Micromobility: Protocol for a Multi-Centre, Mixed Methods Study
- PMID: 39767530
- PMCID: PMC11675237
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121690
Domestic Use of E-Cargo Bikes and Other E-Micromobility: Protocol for a Multi-Centre, Mixed Methods Study
Abstract
Physical inactivity is a leading risk factor for non-communicable diseases. Climate change is now regarded as the biggest threat to global public health. Electric micromobility (e-micromobility, including e-bikes, e-cargo bikes, and e-scooters) has the potential to simultaneously increase people's overall physical activity while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions where it substitutes for motorised transport. The ELEVATE study aims to understand the impacts of e-micromobility, including identifying the people, places, and circumstances where they will be most beneficial in terms of improving people's health while also reducing mobility-related energy demand and carbon emissions. A complex mixed methods design collected detailed quantitative and qualitative data from multiple UK cities. First, nationally representative (n = 2000), city-wide (n = 400 for each of the three cities; total = 1200), and targeted study area surveys (n = 996) collected data on travel behaviour, levels of physical activity, vehicle ownership, and use, as well as attitudes towards e-micromobility. Then, to provide insights on an understudied type of e-micromobility, 49 households were recruited to take part in e-cargo bike one-month trials. Self-reported data from the participants were validated with objective data-using methods such as GPS trackers and smartwatches' recordings of routes and activities. CO2 impacts of e-micromobility use were also calculated. Participant interviews provided detailed information on preferences, expectations, experiences, barriers, and enablers of e-micromobility.
Keywords: active mobility; decarbonisation; e-micromobility; health; physical activity; study protocol.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
From cars to bikes - the feasibility and effect of using e-bikes, longtail bikes and traditional bikes for transportation among parents of children attending kindergarten: design of a randomized cross-over trial.BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):981. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4995-z. BMC Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29282108 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Exploring the factors influencing the use of electrically assisted bikes (e-bikes) by stroke survivors: a mixed methods multiple case study.Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Apr;44(8):1389-1398. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1817986. Epub 2020 Sep 18. Disabil Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 32945706
-
Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA): protocol for a multi-centre, longitudinal study.BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 14;15:1126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2453-3. BMC Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26577129 Free PMC article.
-
Transforming Our Cities: Best Practices Towards Clean Air and Active Transportation.Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Mar;6(1):22-37. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-0228-1. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019. PMID: 30701411 Review.
-
Head protection in electric micromobility: A critical review, recommendations, and future trends.Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106430. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106430. Epub 2021 Oct 13. Accid Anal Prev. 2021. PMID: 34655858 Review.
References
-
- Taxonomy and Classification of Powered Micromobility Vehicles. SAE International; Warrendale, PA, USA: 2019. [(accessed on 15 December 2024)]. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3194_201911/
-
- Mehranfar V., Jones C. Exploring implications and current practices in e-scooter safety: A systematic review. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2024;107:321–382. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.004. - DOI
-
- Haustein S., Møller M. E-bike safety: Individual-level factors and incident characteristics. J. Transp. Health. 2016;3:386–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.001. - DOI
-
- Huang Y., Jiang L., Chen H., Dave K., Parry T. Comparative life cycle assessment of electric bikes for commuting in the UK. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022;105:103213. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103213. - DOI
-
- Ballo L., de Freitas L.M., Meister A., Axhausen K.W. The E-Bike City as a radical shift toward zero-emission transport: Sustainable? Equitable? Desirable? J. Transp. Geogr. 2023;111:103663. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103663. - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources